Time to stop making him the scapegoat at Old Trafford

It was another game and yet another unwanted moment in the spotlight for Manchester United’s David De Gea last night.

The back pages may not have poured the sort of scorn the Spaniard was subjected to in the light of his performance against Tottenham Hotspur earlier this month, but his part in Southampton’s first-half opener has done little to dampen the question marks over his long-term suitability for the number one jersey at Old Trafford.

Although it’s worth noting the key element in that passage is that De Gea did indeed only play a part within Jay Rodriguez’s third minute opener. Michael Carrick’s diabolical back pass would usually be enough to see him take the full-brunt of responsibility had he been playing in front of any other goalkeeper in this league.

De Gea’s current media profile however, ensured that Carrick’s blushes have been relatively spared.

Of course, United’s much-maligned ‘keeper didn’t exactly shower himself in glory with his meek attempt at a 50/50 challenge, although ultimately, he was put in an impossible position by yet another spot of calamitous defending by the rest of his teammates. And it’s this exaggerated sense of defensive responsibility that De Gea seems to be shouldering, which seems dreadfully out of proportion with the bigger overall picture at Old Trafford.

Having shipped in a total of 31 goals so far this season, only Steve Clarke’s West Bromwich Albion have conceded more in the Premier League’s top eleven. The fact they manage to sit seven points clear of Manchester City having conceded a staggering 12 more goals is testament to their outstanding array of attacking talent.

[post_link url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/the-10-things-we-can-expect-to-see-on-transfer-deadline-day,https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/the-10-most-ridiculous-rumours-of-the-january-transfer-window,https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/liverpool/the-5-things-liverpool-need-to-do-before-transfer-deadline-day” target=”_blank” type=”tower”]

The musings of how well this United side would have fared without Robin van Persie may seem tired, but given their sorry state of affairs defensively this season, it’s become verging on the impossible to argue with that sentiment.

Yet although the concept might seem unattainable to some, it’s also worth noting where United might be in this table had David De Gea not been around. Because while the lynch-mob were happy to descend upon the Spaniard following his poor punch which gifted Clint Dempsey the recent equalizer at White Hart Lane, the plaudits weren’t exactly queuing up to congratulate him on his top class-save from the American earlier on in the half.

In one respect, he may well have cost Manchester United a point, yet he ultimately still saved them two.

And until the wider, more gloomy defensive picture is acknowledged and then addressed at Old Trafford, it’s difficult to see when the stinging critique aimed towards De Gea is going to stop.

So far this season, we’ve seen Patrice Evra lauded in many quarters for having one of his best seasons yet at Old Trafford. Ferguson himself has recently gone on record claiming that Rio Ferdinand has enjoyed a great season while also lauding Rafael’s maturing process and Nemanja Vidic is readily seen to be their returning defensive white knight.

Now part of Ferguson’s managerial aptitude is to protect his players from criticism and you’re unlikely to seem him give his back four a public rollicking, despite his side’s woeful defensive record. But it seems somewhat bizarre that public opinion seems to be looking so favorably upon the rest of United’s defensive unit, yet so menacingly upon its goalkeeper.

For however fine the likes of Evra, Ferdinand or even Jonny Evans may have performed individually at times this season, collectively, they’re not enjoying a good season at all. And ultimately, it’s David De Gea who seems to be paying the price.

For any goalkeeper of any age or ability, the circumstances that De Gea had to work under last term were about as difficult as he could have possibly hoped for from his debut season. Instead of walking into a solid, stable and reliable back four, De Gea formed part of an-ever shifting plateau of defensive instability, shorn of its best stopper in Nemanja Vidic and plagued by a perpetual habit of leaking cheap goals.

One season later, and the only thing that really seems to have changed are the further amounts of criticism that David De Gea seems to be taking. United are still leaking cheap goals, at an even more alarming rate than they did last season, but the emphasis continues to be focused upon making De Gea a scapegoat.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Does the amount of points he may have saved his side account for the ones he has also cost United? It’s difficult to say, but considering Ferguson’s side are only two goals short of the amount they conceded for the entirety of last season, those thinking a change in-between the sticks would represent an instant remedy are dreadfully mistaken.

David De Gea’s not been without his faults, although since his move to Old Trafford, he’s hardly been cultivated within a defensive unit that inspires much in the way of confidence.

The blame that’s been thrown his way is grossly out of proportion to the current state of defensive affairs at Manchester Untied and although the levels of expectation at the club allow little for some of the basic errors De Gea has been guilty of, that level also expects far more of the four men that currently sit in front of him, too.

There are no easy answers or shortcuts to be taken when addressing Manchester United’s defensive issues, but using David De Gea as a scapegoat is a measure of convenience rather than one that’s likely to fix their problems anytime soon. It’s time for the rest of his defensive counterparts to stand up and take responsibility – because there’s only so long De Gea can last in the firing line.

Make sure you do your Tax Return before the 31st January, click here now

[cat_link cat=”manchester-united” type=”grid”]

The Europa League Last 32 – all you need to know!

While the first legs of the Champions League have commenced this week, it is now the time for the Europa League to reconvene as we enter the knock out stages good and proper. English hopes rest with Tottenham, Chelsea, Liverpool and Newcastle, who will all be looking to take comfortable leads going into their second legs next week.

The good people of UEFA have culminated a list of 20 facts ahead of the last 32 showdowns for your viewing pleasure:

1. The round of 32 participants come from 16 countries, with representation split as follows:

4 clubs – England, Germany

3 clubs – Italy, Russia, Ukraine

2 clubs – Czech Republic, France, Romania, Spain

1 club – Belarus, Belgium, Greece, Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, Turkey

2. Four of the seven countries with just one participant are represented by clubs that transferred from the UEFA Champions League: FC BATE Borisov (Belarus), Olympiacos FC (Greece), AFC Ajax (Netherlands) and SL Benfica (Portugal).

3. Twelve clubs are competing in the UEFA Europa League knockout phase for the first time – Chelsea FC, CFR 1907 Cluj, Newcastle United FC, FC Anji Makhachkala, Levante UD, FC Internazionale Milano, VfL Borussia Mönchengladbach, KRC Genk, FC Girondins de Bordeaux, FC Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk, Olympique Lyonnais and Tottenham Hotspur FC.

4. Chelsea, the UEFA Champions League holders, are the only one of the 32 participating teams who have never previously competed in the UEFA Europa League. Of the other 31 participants, only one side has played fewer than six UEFA Europa League matches – Olympiacos with four.

5. Chelsea are joined in the field by five other previous winners of the European Cup – Inter, Liverpool FC, Benfica, Ajax and FC Steaua Bucureşti. Ajax and Steaua meet in the last 32.

6. UEFA Europa League holders Club Atlético de Madrid are one of seven other clubs in the last 32 who have won a major UEFA club competition title. They are joined by FC Zenit St Petersburg, FC Dynamo Kyiv, Bayer 04 Leverkusen, Mönchengladbach, S.S. Lazio, Tottenham and SSC Napoli. Newcastle won the non-UEFA-backed Inter-Cities Fairs Cup.

7. There are six reigning domestic champions competing in the round of 32 – BATE (Belarus), CFR Cluj (Romania), Olympiacos (Greece), Zenit (Russia), Ajax (Netherlands) and FC Basel 1893 (Switzerland).

8. The field includes eight teams that hold the record for domestic league titles in their homeland – BATE (Belarus), Fenerbahçe SK (Turkey, shared), Olympiacos (Greece), Dynamo Kyiv (Ukraine), Benfica (Portugal), Ajax (Netherlands), Steaua (Romania) and AC Sparta Praha (Czech Republic).

9. Of the seven clubs that entered the UEFA Europa League group stage, six made it through to the knockout phase – Tottenham, Lyon, Leverkusen, Napoli, FC Rubin Kazan and holders Atlético. The only ones to suffer group stage elimination were A. Académica de Coimbra.

10. Including qualifying and play-off fixtures, the clubs who have required most games in Europe this season to reach the last 32 are BATE, Basel, Anji and FC Viktoria Plzeň, each with 12.

[opinion-widget op]

11. Anji and Plzeň are the UEFA Europa League’s longest survivors this season, having entered in the second qualifying round. BATE and Basel began their European campaigns at the equivalent stage of the UEFA Champions League.

12. Eleven of the teams in the round of 32 began their European season in the UEFA Champions League – the eight teams that transferred over after the group stage plus Mönchengladbach, Basel and Fenerbahçe, who switched competition after the play-offs.

13. Ajax and Rubin are making their fourth successive appearances in the round of 32. The only other surviving participants that have appeared in all four editions of the UEFA Europa League are Atlético and Steaua.

14. Ajax will be especially keen to reach the final as it is staged in their own Amsterdam ArenA. Should they do so, they will become the first club to appear on home turf in a UEFA Europa League final. Two clubs managed the feat in a one-off UEFA Cup final, Feyenoord defeating Borussia Dortmund in Rotterdam in 2002 and Sporting Clube de Portugal losing to PFC CSKA Moskva in Lisbon in 2005.

15. Diego Simeone (Atlético) and André Villas-Boas (Tottenham) are bidding to become the first coach to win the UEFA Europa League twice, Simeone having captured it with Atlético in 2011/12 and Villas-Boas with FC Porto in 2010/11.

16. Also still involved in the round of 32 are UEFA Cup-winning coaches Juande Ramos (Dnipro), who won the competition back-to-back with Sevilla FC (2006 and 2007), and Chelsea’s Rafael Benítez (with Valencia CF in 2004). Genk’s Mario Been was an assistant coach in Feyenoord’s 2002 win.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

17. Only two coaches involved in the round of 32 have lifted the European Champion Clubs’ Cup – Anji’s Guus Hiddink, a winner with PSV Eindhoven in 1988, and Benítez with Liverpool in 2005. Additionally, Villas-Boas was the Chelsea coach for part of their triumphant 2011/12 UEFA Champions League campaign before being replaced by Roberto Di Matteo.

18. Round of 32 coaches who won the UEFA Cup as a player are Leverkusen’s Sami Hyypiä (with Liverpool, 2001), Simeone (Inter, 1998) and Ajax’s Frank de Boer (Ajax, 1992).

19. Hyypiä and De Boer were also UEFA Champions League winners as players, with Liverpool (2005) and Ajax (1995) respectively, while Dynamo Kyiv’s Oleh Blokhin won the European Cup Winners’ Cup twice with the Ukrainian club in 1975 and 1986.

20. A number of players with English teams will take on former clubs in the last 32 – Tottenham goalkeeper Hugo Lloris (against Lyon), Liverpool defender Martin Škrtel (Zenit) and Chelsea goalkeeper Petr Čech (Sparta Praha).

Jol thrilled with victory

Fulham manager Martin Jol celebrated the performance of his side, after their 1-0 Premier League win over Tottenham.

Ex-Spurs striker Dimitar Berbatov netted the only goal of the game after 52 minutes to give the Cottagers a memorable victory against their London rivals at White Hart Lane.

The result lifts Fulham into the top half of the table, with their tally of 36 points all but guaranteeing another season in the top flight.

Jol was happy with his players’ performances and the result:

“It was a great win, that’s exactly what we needed. Especially being at White Hart Lane, to get a win is fantastic,” he told Sky Sports.

“It was a collective thing. In the first half we restricted them and in the second half we played ever so well and should have scored a second goal.

“Twice Jermain [Defoe] had shots and the save [from Schwarzer] was incredible.”

The Dutchman went on to praise his team for their efforts since the turn of the year:

“Since the first of January we have had four wins, three draws and two defeats to the two Manchester clubs.

“We are doing well and the top 10, that is good.”

Fulham are now nine points clear of the relegation zone, with their recent form appearing to have evaporated rumours that they could be sucked into a scrap for survival.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

The Cottagers face a trip to QPR next time out, before hosting Newcastle and Aston Villa.

[cat_link cat=”fulham” type=”grid”]

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’right’]

Southampton v Liverpool – Match Preview

One win, three draws and three defeats is what you’d refer to as a mixed bag for manager settling into life at a new club. Managerial change has dominated the bottom clubs once again this week after Reading sacked Brian McDermott, with comparisons instantly drawn with Southampton’s decision to dispense with Nigel Adkins. The above-stated record belongs to his replacement and current Saints boss Mauricio Pochettino. It’s an admirable start considering that solitary victory came against Premier League champions Manchester City but highlights the instability that come with mid-seasons dugout reshuffles. While the Saints are probably assured of another season in the t0p-flight they’re close to the relegation zone than they were when Pochettini0 arrived; the players struggling to get to grips with his newly implemented methods. So probably not the best time to play in-form Liverpool then?

The Reds are on a crusade to secure European qualification for next season and took a monumental step towards achieving that by beating Tottenham last season. The addition of Phillipe Coutinho has breathed new and exciting life into the Reds attack in recent weeks and with Luis Suarez still performing at the top rung, their overall record of 21 goals in the last seven top-flight fixtures tells its own story. Such is the confidence of Brendan Rodgers’ side at the moment you’d be crazy not to bank on them recording a fourth win on the spin. Especially with Suarez in such irresistible form, 16 goals in as many games, and he will relish the trip to the South Coast having notched a hat trick in Liverpool’s last away game against Wigan.

Team News

Danny Fox (thigh) and Steven Davis (illness) are near full fitness meaning Southampton could have a fully fit squad on Saturday.

Pepe Reina could return for Liverpool after overcoming a thigh injury. The prospect of shoulder surgery may not be enough to keep Joe Allen from playing.

What the managers said…

“Liverpool have been on a very good run and have very good players. But we will go all out to play very well in order to get the three points. We have to know who we are facing, but we also have a winning mentality and we are definitely going to try and win and that mentality is growing within my group every day. For me his most important aspect is his mentality and his focus. Aside from his technical virtues, he is a true winner and that is clear. In our tactical planning we always think of the whole of the opposition, but we also take into account the qualities of all of the individuals.” Mauricio Pochettino warned his side to be wary of Liverpool and Luis Suarez in particular (saintsfc.co.uk)“Our recent run of form will show that we’re a team which is improving and developing. The win against Tottenham showed further enhancement of that. The teams above will know they can’t be making any slip-ups, not only because of us but for themselves. This is the stage of the season when you want to win games. We can only concentrate on ourselves and get as many victories as we can.” Brendan Rodgers warned Liverpool’s rivals for European place to watch their backs (Liverpool Echo)

Pre-Match Statistic: The last time Southampton and Liverpool met at St Mary’s was in January 2005 when the home side ran out 2-0 winners.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Prediction: Southampton 1-3 Liverpool

Watch The LIVE Blog below

Live Football Blogs on FootballFanCast.com »

Man City boss says winger can leave

Roberto Mancini has suggested that Scott Sinclair may leave Manchester City at the end of the season, as he seeks first-team action.

The former Chelsea man only joined City from Swansea in August 2012, moving to the Etihad Stadium in a deal worth £6.2million, but has struggled to establish himself in the first team.

Sinclair has started just three games this term and he has been linked with a potential return to Swansea, with the 24-year-old desperate for more action.

Mancini admits he can understand the frustration and says it is not the player’s fault, instead he feels Sinclair has been ‘unlucky’ and he hinted that he may need to move to resolve the situation.

The City boss said: “I think it is better if he can have another solution.

“If he stays here, maybe, everything can change but I can understand his frustration in this moment because he didn’t play a lot of games.”

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Mancini concedes Sinclair is a ‘good player that deserves to play always’ but with City being linked with moves for the likes of Napoli’s Edinson Cavani, it appears his chances maybe be even more limited next Premier League season.

[cat_link cat=”manchester-city” type=”grid”]

Arsenal turn their attention to Dutch stopper

Arsenal could try and sign Tim Krul after a move for Julio Cesar stalled, reports the Metro.

The Gunners were interested in offering Cesar a move back to the Premier League, but have been told by the Brazilian to wait until he returns from holiday.

Arsene Wenger is considering turning his attention to Newcastle shot stopper Tim Krul, as he looks to provide competition for Wojciech Szczesny and Lukasz Fabianski. Wenger has also sold Victor Mannone to Sunderland in order to make room for a new goalkeeper.

The Gunners look set to bid £6million to land the 25-year-old, who could be tempted to leave struggling Newcastle for Champions League football. The Dutch ‘keeper is thought to be admired by Wenger, after Krul established himself as one of the top ‘keepers in the league with the Toon.

But after a difficult season for Newcastle, where they slumped to a 16th place finish, Wenger is hoping he can convince the Dutchman to leave the Magpies, despite being contracted to the side for four more years.

Although Cesar is expected to cost just £1million from QPR, it is believed that Arsenal’s French manager would prefer to sign Krul, despite having to pay much more for the Dutchman.

Should Wenger sign Krul? Or should he take the cheaper option?

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Join the debate below!

‪[cat_link cat=”arsenal” type=”grid”]

Now is the time to properly assess this Arsenal signing

A good run of form was always necessary in order to properly assess the signing of Mathieu Flamini. Anything else and Arsenal and Arsene Wenger would have been rightly targeted by the club’s faithful and of course the media.

The Flamini signing was announced more or less in tandem with Mesut Ozil, and yet there remained a degree of frustration that the easy, cheap option was chosen in the way of midfield reinforcement over, you know, actually spending some money. With free signings who were cast off by their previous clubs, there’s always a high probability of failure, which is something most supporters would have had in their minds, not to mention the fact that Flamini only had one good season in midfield during his first stint at Arsenal.

But transfer fee aside, as well as the lack of reputation when the club can afford to attract some of the biggest names in Europe, the signing of Flamini is exactly what Arsenal have needed. He’s exactly what the team needed because everyone, or at least the majority, were up in arms about signing a player in the mould of Marouane Fellaini, someone who can stem the opposition tide from midfield.

[cat_link cat=”arsenal” type=”list”]

Here’s one of those grating Wenger quotes that apply: “is Fellaini actually better than what Arsenal currently have?” Some may say yes, as a defensive midfielder he is. But Arsenal don’t need him and the team certainly don’t play to his strengths. It’s not so much that £28 million on the Belgian would have been excessive, but rather a complete waste of money. As should always be the case, it’s about buying the players who are right for the team and its football.

Flamini is a squad player, or at least that’s what he has been labelled as since and even prior to his signing. Mikel Arteta is still the pivot in the Arsenal midfield, and I’m reluctant to use the word ‘centrepiece’ due to the presence of a German in the attack. But the Spaniard is the player who keeps the rest of the team ticking over, and where Aaron Ramsey or Jack Wilshere may be used as rotating partners, Flamini adds depth and, on paper, a selection of options that amount to something far from a thin midfield.

Then there’s the bonuses. Since his arrival, Flamini has put forward a set of performances that could be considered Man of the Match efforts. He brings steel, leadership and a defensive barrier to the midfield, all the while never really comprising the team’s footballing output. The Frenchman is not quite a reference point in the midfield in the way Arteta is for Arsenal or Sergio Busquets is for Barcelona. Instead, he provides necessary cover when that baton of responsibility gets passed on in the absence of Arteta; someone who can quickly and effectively reclaim possession and move it on. And let’s make no mistake here, for all the preconceived ideas fans may have had on this signing, Flamini is good enough to contribute a lot to this Arsenal team.

The club are making do for now on the defensive front, with Thomas Vermaelen returning to the squad on the weekend against Stoke. But when the fixtures do pile up, the returning midfielders – Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Tomas Rosicky – will give Wenger enough freedom to use Flamini as an emergency option at full-back.

Signings don’t always have to glamorous or with price tags of £20 million. For every Ozil or Cazorla that gets signed, there needs to be useful squad players who offer continuity in the absence of those who are considered first choice.

Up until this point, and provided Flamini retains his form and effectiveness throughout the season, Wenger has completed a fantastic piece of business in bringing the Frenchman back. It certainly wasn’t what the fans wanted at first, but credit to the manager for keeping a cool head and seeing the benefits this signing would have over the course of the season. Flamini is quickly defining the important backup player that Arsenal haven’t always had in their ranks.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

How good is the signing of Flamini at Arsenal?

Join the debate below

[ad_pod id=’capone’ align=’center’]

Why Arsenal may not need maximum points to win the title

Arsene Wenger has said the Premier League is a marathon not a sprint, ahead of the crucial Champions League tie away to Napoli. Despite approaching fixtures against Manchester City and Chelsea in the league, Wenger is placing far more importance in the Champions League, where Arsenal can qualify first from their group with a draw in Naples.

There is far too much importance placed in the points gained from the big league matches, especially this season. But such has been the inconsistency of those who are considered title challengers – Chelsea conceding three in back-to-back games against Sunderland and Stoke; Manchester City still shaky away from home; and Manchester United fighting for a top four place as of now – that it is simply doesn’t matter how the title winner finishes first.

Arsenal have been criticised in the past for their inability to get maximum points from the “lesser” teams in the league, often failing to turn up mentally and with the idea that a win was already in the bag. But this season, Wenger has added urgency to his team. They’re no longer careless in their approach, for the most part going for the win from the off.

It’s the kind of results that do separate title winners from the chasing pack. Arsenal have taken points and even won at grounds where others have failed, and notably those with greater resources. If Arsenal fail to pick up maximum points against Manchester City and Chelsea over the next two games, it shouldn’t matter too much. Neither side is void of problems, while Arsenal have a cushion of five points on second and third placed Liverpool and Chelsea.

But does it really matter how the title is won? Is a champion any less a champion because they haven’t won all of the big games? Why should it matter as long as they do eventually finish higher than the rest due to a consistency that others failed to establish in low-key games?

Manchester United won the title in 2011 and yet lost away games against Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea, while also drawing away to both Spurs and Manchester City. United didn’t have to win the individual sprints; over the course of the marathon, they were better than everyone else.

On paper, Arsenal are better than the teams they have beaten in the league this season. It was important, though, to take points from that position of superiority, where in the past they likely would have conceded late or simply failed to get out of the starting gate.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Arsenal don’t have to win each of the heavyweight match-ups this season. At the midway point of the season, Wenger’s side are showing a consistency that is lost on others.

[ad_pod id=’btcityarsenal’ align=’center’]

What happened to all the Norwegians within the Premier League?

Can you remember the Norwegian invasion on English football in the 90’s? Back in the days when premiership footballers had fathomable salaries and 40-yard back track followed by a studded tackle to the knee-region was applauded as much as a cup winning 30-yard strike in injury time? Norwegians left their mark on the premiership back then, playing important roles for the biggest club’s in the country. In the early days of the Premier League, Norwegian footballers were held in high stature. Their Norse bravery and fierce professionalism prompted an army – perhaps not as brutal as the Viking invasion in the 10th century, but equally purposeful – of Norwegians to cross the pond to fulfil their dream in the spiritual home of football. Now, there are two Vikings – Fulham’s Brede Hangeland and John Arne Riise – left with realistic starting credentials in the Premier League.

What happened? How come one of England’s prime markets for foreign talent has so completely seized to be exploited?

As a Norwegian myself, I know how prestigious the English Premier League is for young footballers and aspiring talents in our country. It is only one- and a half hours flight away, and it is by our estimates the strongest, biggest and most spectacular league in the world. Most Norwegian kids who play football will grow up supporting an English team above any Norwegian side. Either it be Arsenal, Liverpool or Manchester United (or the poor sod whose dad forced him to wear Leeds kit), Premier League teams are the biggest influence on Norwegian footballers. We are Anglophile, and in football terms there is nothing better than the magnificent grandness of the English Premier League. Our Promised Land.

This became self-enforcing in the 90’s. When our best footballers started succeeding here, there was suddenly an inclining to support a team from Merseyside rather than the unglamorous local club, however sharp their performance in Tippeligaen – the Norwegian top tier – might be. I can remember myself having kick-abouts wearing a tiny replica of the Man United kit with ‘SOLSKJAER  20’ written across the back. I think the shirt was too small for any print, but a nice man in the local supporter shop sorted it out. The back looked crammed, but I had the name of my idol written on the back of the kit of my favourite team.

And players like Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, Henning Berg and Tore Andre Flo made dominating figures in the premiership. They rarely made a fuzz off the pitch, won titles, and – most importantly – became crowd icons. At Old Trafford’s Stretford End you can still find the ‘2OLEgend’ banner, as a tribute to the man who won the 1999 Champions League final. There was never any awkward questions asked with Norwegian players. I believe this is one of the few factors that made them so appealing. In terms of professionalism, Norway was actually ahead of England. A Norwegian player would gladly sit on the bench, work his socks off for 45 minutes in whatever position necessary, and go home to get in bed at an appropriate time. This is all part of the professional attitude expected from the modern footballer, but the reality in England in the two decades ago involved a tad more beer, and possibly showing up for training with a hangover.

However, the biggest reason for the decline of Norwegians in the Premier League is directly connected with the decline of Norwegian football. It’s simply not on the level it used to be. When the internationals made it to our two only World Cups ever in 94 and 98, with coach Egil ‘Drillo’ Olsen at the helm, Norway was a considerable force internationally. With a rigid defensive style, and a rapid counter attack, Norway created history, most memorably when they beat Brazil 2-1 in Marseille in the final group game in 98. This is still one of Norway’s greatest sports moments of all time. It took us to a sensational (and questionable) second place on the newly initiated FIFA-ranking. We played a type of football that stifled even the toughest opponents on the planet. But since then, Norway only made an abysmal appearance in the Euro 2000’s – the last championship we have played in to date.

Part of the problem with our football is that we are struggling to find an identity. Other teams found us out eventually, and the long ball towards a big target man with a runner rushing onto the through pass is too predictable for the modern game, and most countries are more than capable of securing themselves from getting caught on the brake. Likewise, we have failed to create players that are technically adept to play modern football. The standard of the national team has been in steady decline, and never really made a transition to an adamant way of playing football. Drillo made a comeback as national coach in 2009, but failed to make it through the World Cup qualifiers in a group containing Switzerland, Island, Cyprus, Albania and Slovenia. His pragmatic approach never agreed with the young players’ desire to move the ball along the floor. There was no plan-B, and Norway missed a phenomenal chance to play in Brazil.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

So the golden generation of Solskjaer, Flo, Berg and Ronny Johnsen has passed, and no one has really managed to form an effective side since. However, better times could be approaching for Norwegian football. Some of you might remember this summer’s Under-21 European Championship where Norway hammered an English side that fielded players like Wilfred Zaha and Thomas Ince 3-1. There is an interesting new generation coming through in Norway. Former Manchester United academy player of the year, and current Molde midfielder Mads Daehlie, has been described by coach Solskjaer as a Scholes-esque player maker, and Juventus are expressing major hopes for their 17-year old prospect Vajebah Sakor.

In a few years, with a little push in the right direction, the Norwegian might launch yet another crusade to the British isles.

Newcastle to reignite interest in Dutch hitman

Alan Pardew has reignited his interest in Borussia Monchengladbach striker Luuk de Jong, according to the Metro.

The Magpies have been heavily linked with Dutch striker on several occasions in the past, with Pardew attempting to lure the 23-year-old from FC Twente, before he opted for a £12.6million switch to the Bundesliga.

However De Jong has failed to recapture the form in Germany that saw him labeled one of the most promising young forward’s in Europe, managing just six league goals in 23 appearances since his move in the summer of 2012.

Pardew is keen to add more firepower to his frontline this month, with Loic Remy only on loan until the end of the season, and Shola Ameobi entering the final six months of his contract.

The Magpies have also been linked with the loan signing of  former striker Demba Ba from Chelsea, although the strikers wages could prove a stumbling block.

Pardew is also desperate to hang on to the stars he already has at his disposal, and is bracing himself for offers from France for midfielder Yohan Cabaye, who has been linked with a move to Paris St Germain.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Premier League rivals Arsenal and Liverpool have also been linked with a move for the French midfielder.

Get all your Capital OneCup news here »

Game
Register
Service
Bonus