Rangers in pole position to sign Bailey Rice

Rangers are leading the race to sign Motherwell wonderkid Bailey Rice, according to Football Insider.

The Lowdown: Sought-after prospect 

The youngster does not turn 16 until October; once he does, he will then be eligible to sign his first professional contract.

Back in March, it was reported that Brighton and Manchester City were interested in signing the Scotsman, who has now made 14 caps at youth level for his country, but it looks like he will be opting to stay closer to home.

The 15-year-old is a centre-back who also has experience playing in midfield, having featured in a number of roles for Scotland’s U17 side.

The Latest: Rangers leading the race

Rice has been the subject of heavy interest by both Rangers and Celtic this summer, alongside a number of Premier League clubs.

According to a fresh report by Football Insider, the Gers are emerging as the favourites to sign the young defender, with the Light Blues now in pole position to secure the Motherwell player’s signature.

The Verdict: Bags of potential

It would be a major coup for Giovanni van Bronckhorst’s side if the Glasgow outfit beat their city rivals to the Scottish wonderkid.

Rice could end up on the same trajectory as academy graduate Nathan Patterson, who joined Premier League side Everton for a reported £12m fee in January, with add-ons bringing this total up to £16m.

Rangers will of course want to try and replicate this type of business in the future, so the potential arrival of the 15-year-old may be yet another master-stroke in the long-run, whether he fulfils his potential at Ibrox or elsewhere.

Newcastle transfer news on Diaby

Reliable journalist Ryan Taylor has now shares some big transfer news on reported Newcastle United target Moussa Diaby.

The Lowdown: Diaby eyed

It has been widely reported that the St. James’ Park outfit are eyeing up a potential move for Diaby this summer.

It is certainly no surprise to see the interest given the season that he has had at Bayer Leverkusen, where he managed to score no fewer than 17 goals and supply a further 14 assists in total across all competitions, mainly operating from the flanks (Transfermarkt).

The Latest: Not for sale

Taking to Twitter, Taylor has revealed that Diaby is ‘not for sale’ after talking to Leverkusen director Simon Rolfes:

“Sat down with Bayer Leverkusen director Simon Rolfes, who told me NUFC target Moussa Diaby is not for sale.”

The Daily Express journalist shared the following comments made by Rolfes when asked if Diaby could leave:

“We want to keep Moussa for as long as possible. We have no offers & aren’t looking for them at the moment.”

The Verdict: Big blow

It would be a big blow if the North East club were to miss out on signing Diaby this summer.

Morade Djeddi, the president of his first club Esperance Paris 19e, has claimed that the France international has a ‘supernatural, divine gift’, evidenced by his form in front of goal.

He has been praised by German media for his ‘amazing’ dribbling, ‘irresistible’ pace and ‘astonishing’ speed of thought, and was even dubbed ‘unstoppable’ after scoring one goal and setting up another in a crushing 4-0 win over Borussia Monchengladbach (Bundesliga).

Diaby and Allan Saint-Maximin could form a quite deadly duo on either wing for the Magpies, but it looks like this is one PIF will have to re-visit some time in the future.

In other news, find out what significant NUFC transfer update has now been dropped here!

Celtic must secure Ola Solbakken transfer

Celtic have seen many players move in and out of the squad over the past decade either on permanent or loan deals.

In terms of the players that joined the Hoops, while some may not have made an impact, one that definitely made the most of his time at Parkhead is Patrick Roberts.

During two loan spells from Premier League club Manchester City, the winger ended up making 78 appearances across all competitions.

In those appearances, the Englishman scored 18 goals, provided 26 assists and won seven trophies in the process.

Predominantly playing on the right-wing, the 25-year-old played in numerous positions across the attack and midfield, making himself a useful and versatile squad option.

Now that the former Celtic loan star has brought an end to his time with the Premier League champions and joined Sunderland, it doesn’t seem likely that he’ll be returning to Parkhead anytime soon.

However, the Hoops could sign what may well be a new version of Roberts this summer by securing a move for Bodo/Glimt winger Ola Solbakken, who was linked with a move to Celtic Park last month.

With 53 appearances under his belt on the right wing and 41 on the left, his versatility could also make him a useful option for Postecoglou as Roberts was for Celtic during his period with the club.

In 115 senior club appearances, the £1.8m-rated attacker has found the net 23 times and delivered 27 assists, showing that, once again, just like Roberts, Solbakken has a knack for not only scoring but creating goals as well from the wings.

To compare Roberts’ 2017/18 season at Celtic with Solbakken’s current campaign with his current club, the Norwegian attacker currently has a higher average of assists per 90 minutes than the Englishman racked up.

Labelled as being “[Jose] Mourinho’s nightmare” by journalist Pablo Giralt after the 23-year-old scored two goals in the 6-1 victory over AS Roma back in October, Solbakken could be a solid addition to Celtic’s ranks as they aim to not only regain the SPFL title but also get their hands on other domestic trophies and do their best in Europe.

Moving forward, should Postecoglou feel the need to strengthen what already is a rather attacking team this summer, securing a deal for the Bodo/Glimt star could be a great bit of business for the Parkhead club and give the fans a new version of Roberts to enjoy watching.

In other news: Better than Edouard: Celtic eyeing “feisty” 51-goal dynamo, supporters surely buzzing

Spurs dealt setback ahead of Liverpool

Tottenham Hotspur have been dealt a further setback ahead of their Premier League meeting with Liverpool tonight.

What’s the latest?

Speaking in his pre-match press conference (via Evening Standard), Jurgen Klopp revealed that he has a fully fit squad at his disposal for the meeting with Spurs, with the 54-year-old hinting that Roberto Firmino will be available for selection should he feel that the centre-forward is required.

When asked whether the Brazil international will be fit to feature against Spurs, the German said: “I don’t know, but he is back in training, so now we have to make a decision about that. But let’s see. Yesterday he was in training, was great.”

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-spurs-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-much-more” title= “Read the latest Spurs news!”]

When asked whether the remainder of his squad will be available for selection, Klopp added: “Yes. I don’t have my smartphone here, because I get messages pretty late, but when I checked it last time, yes.”

Conte will be gutted

Considering just how important tonight’s fixture is for Tottenham’s hopes of securing a top-four finish this season, the news that Firmino looks as if he will be available and that the rest of the Liverpool squad are fit, coupled with Spurs’ earlier loss of Sergio Reguilon to injury, is sure to have left Antonio Conte gutted.

Indeed, the Reds have been in exceptional form across all competitions this season, having already lifted the Carabao Cup, secured a place in the final of both the Champions League and the FA Cup.

In addition, they are just one point behind Manchester City at the top of the Premier League table, with Klopp being in with a fantastic chance of securing an unprecedented quadruple.

As such, when taking into account just how talented the current crop of Liverpool players quite clearly is, the news that the Reds have no injury concerns ahead of the Tottenham game is sure to come as a huge blow to Spurs’ chances of picking up a positive result at Anfield, with Conte in desperate need of the three points if he is to give his side the best possible shot at securing Champions League football next season.

AND in other news: Conte starts “really special” talent & drops “awful” £82k-p/w flop: Spurs predicted XI

Chaotic selections put Australia's World Cup at risk

With the team using 26 players over 11 matches in the last three series, stability is not the first word that comes to mind for the defending champions

Andrew McGlashan05-Jan-20195:53

Martyn: Like Lyon’s selection in ODI squad, not Siddle’s

The Australian selection meetings would make a fascinating fly-on-the-wall documentary. They certainly aren’t dull (and this isn’t even about Marnus Labuschagne).For example, here’s a quick recap of the last three ODI squads:England – June 2018:Tim Paine, Aaron Finch, Ashton Agar, Alex Carey, Travis Head, Nathan Lyon, Glenn Maxwell, Shaun Marsh, Michael Neser, Jhye Richardson, Kane Richardson, D’Arcy Short, Billy Stanlake, Marcus Stoinis, Andrew TyeSouth Africa – November 2018:Aaron Finch, Alex Carey, Josh Hazlewood, Ashton Agar, Pat Cummins, Nathan Coulter-Nile, Travis Head, Chris Lynn, Shaun Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, D’Arcy Short, Mitchell Starc, Marcus Stoinis, Adam ZampaIndia – January 2019:Aaron Finch, Jason Behrendorff, Alex Carey, Peter Handscomb, Usman Khawaja, Nathan Lyon, Mitch Marsh, Shaun Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, Jhye Richardson, Peter Siddle, Billy Stanlake, Marcus Stoinis, Adam ZampaThat’s potentially 26 players over 11 matches in those three series. Even taking into account the absence of The Duo (Australia’s one-day slump began well before the ball-tampering fallout), the inevitable injuries that occur, and wanting to look at bench strength, that is a lot. Less than five months from the World Cup, where they are defending champions, stability is not the word that springs to mind. Chaos perhaps does.”We believe the squad we have selected will give us a great opportunity to not only be competitive at home this summer, but it also allows us to start to build continuity leading into next year’s tournament” – National selector Trevor Hohns after naming the squad to face South Africa in November.”After a disappointing period in ODI cricket, the National Selection Panel along with team coaches have reviewed our performances across this format and we’ve identified a number of key areas that we feel we need to improve in order to help put this team in the best possible position to turn this period around. With this in mind and the World Cup looming, we’ve selected players we feel provide us with the flexibility to play a variety of roles at different stages of a match.” – Hohns after naming the squad to face India in January.Also see: Australia make wholesale changes, bring back Siddle and Lyon for ODIsThere are some caveats to the vast number of changes: the main three quicks – Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins – have been rested/rotated/managed while Nathan Coulter-Nile has experienced some back pain. It is to be assumed that the big three come straight back for the World Cup, although they are far from the magic bullet as their presence has not helped arrest the one-day slide.Although Peter Siddle’s recall stands out – he last played an ODI in 2010 – it is perhaps a little less left-field than it looks given his reinvention as a fine T20 bowler in the BBL. All the other bowlers selected make some sense as well – or at least can be argued one way or another – although the selectors continue to go round in circles about whether Nathan Lyon is an ODI cricketer.The most interesting u-turn has been in the batting personnel. Steven Smith and David Warner remain on the outer and are all-but certain to be in the World Cup squad, but that doesn’t hide the shift that has taken place. The selectors don’t seem to know what they want or, perhaps, they know what they want but don’t know to get it.A year ago, (with, it should be noted, Warner and Smith in the XI) Australia couldn’t find the top-order tempo to match England. On the tour of England a few months later, a hotch-potch side was comfortably overpowered. So at the start of this Australian season, the focus was on power as Chris Lynn was recalled to much fanfare.David Warner and Steven Smith look on before the start of the match•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesLynn made 57 in three matches against South Africa. One of those innings brought 44 at a run-a-ball, then he was asked to open and made a first-ball duck. It’s not much of a sample size. Usman Khawaja (last ODI January 2017) and Peter Handscomb (last ODI October 2017) are now back in the fold, Travis Head has gone from a one-day cricketer to a Test cricketer in the space of six months, and four ODIs have been enough to make a judgement on Short.Here’s Hohns again: “Usman is a batsman we know can put vital runs on the board at the top of the order, and Peter is not only a fine player of spin bowling, he’s also a batsman we know can hold an innings together while keeping the scoreboard ticking over.”Neither Khawaja or Handscomb were deemed the right men for the job previously. Khawaja’s List A numbers are very solid – an average of 45.76 – but it feels like clutching at straws if he is suddenly going to be the answer to revive the top order. Handscomb averaged 51.57 in the JLT, a much derided competition, but then Lynn averaged 75.33 with two centuries to Handscomb’s none. If Australia still believe totals of 280-300 will suffice, it’s putting an awful lot on the bowlers.We are in strange times. So much about Australia’s selections is a cross between a holding pattern and just hoping the next idea works. It might be, somehow, that it all comes together in England: Smith and Warner make the difference to the top order, Glenn Maxwell provides an x-factor, Alex Carey becomes a finisher, they work out what role the spinner should play, Starc rediscovers his swing and the juggling of the fast bowlers come out with a combination that can dismantle any opposition.It might, but don’t count on it.

'This is how cornered tigers fight'

The reactions on Twitter following Pakistan’s close three-wicket win over Sri Lanka

ESPNcricinfo staff12-Jun-2017Chasing 237, Pakistan’s semi-final hopes were looking up when they were 92 for 1. It started fading as the slide began: 92 for 2… 95 for 3… 110 for 4… 131 for 5… 137 for 6… and eventually 162 for 7. But Sarfraz Ahmed, their captain, and Mohammad Amir combined to see them home, much to the delight of their supporters.

Before his composure with the bat, Mohammad Amir had begun the slide in Sri Lanka’s innings, removing the two set batsmen in Angelo Mathews and Niroshan Dickwella.

Sri Lanka would rue the chances they missed on the field.

Lasith Malinga tried his best to fashion a win but his efforts seemed futile as Sarfraz Ahmed was dropped twice in six balls off his bowling.

Was Sri Lanka’s performance one of the worst seen on the field in recent times?

The win extended Pakistan’s dominance over Sri Lanka in big tournaments.

The match was surely the best in the group phase of a tournament that had too many lacklustre contests.

Time for apologies?

Pakistan meet hosts England, one of the tournament favourites, in the semi-finals. Will it again be their day?

Hafeez, bowlers seal 16-run win for Pakistan

ESPNcricinfo staff15-Jan-2016Mohammad Hafeez, however, was steady at the other end and scored his eighth T20I fifty•Getty ImagesMitchell Santner and Adam Milne restricted Pakistan’s middle order with quick wickets in the middle overs•AFPShahid Afridi, though, smashed 23 off eight balls to lift Pakistan to 171 for 9•AFPMilne ended the innings with a career-best 4 for 37•Getty ImagesPakistan got a huge boost in the chase when Martin Guptill was run out in the second over for 2•Getty ImagesColin Munro and Kane Williamson then put the hosts well on course by stringing together an 80-run second-wicket stand at almost ten runs an over•AFPHowever, Munro fell in the tenth over for a 27-ball 56, giving Pakistan a shot in the arm•Getty ImagesPakistan’s bowlers then carved out the hosts’ middle order, reducing them from 90 for 2 to 108 for 6. But with Williamson still at the crease, New Zealand still had a chance of chasing down the total•AFPHowever, Wahab Riaz dismissed Williamson for 70 and the hosts’ lower order failed to fire, handing Pakistan a 16-run victory•AFP

The sisterhood of the England captains

Charlotte Edwards and Clare Connor talk about captaining England, rooming together, and how they used a 15-year-old to plot the downfall of Australia

Interview by Izzy Westbury24-Aug-2014Since 1990, England Women have had just three permanent captains. For almost 15 years it has been the duo of Clare Connor and Charlotte Edwards who have overseen the most successful and transitional period of the women’s game. With the former now retired as a player to be the ECB’s head of women’s cricket and the latter still skipper of the national side, one of the game’s closest partnership-friendships has continued. Here the two leaders of the revolution talk about their role together in the past, present and future.You two met at England Under-19 trials back in 1992 – Clare was 16, Charlotte 12. What do you remember about it?Clare Connor: She was the youngest by such a long way. It was Under-19 trials and I thought I was going to be quite young at 16! It was all so unknown. I was completely new to women’s cricket. I went through boys’ school cricket – a similar route to Lottie but different because I was at private school. It’s so funny looking back, because the summer of ’93 was obviously when England won the [women’s] World Cup here, but I wasn’t aware of it all that much.Charlotte Edwards: Same for me. In my world it was like, “I’m going to play for the England men’s team,” because I was getting picked for the boys’ county team, I was captain of the boys’ team and I was picked for regional-level boys’ cricket. I think it was only at Under-13 level when I properly had my first moment where I thought, “I’m not quite good enough for this”.CC: All we’d ever done was play boys’ cricket. Now it’s very different and that’s the beauty of Chance to Shine – because now it’s such a different experience for girls playing the game; there are loads of girls doing it. For us it wasn’t like that.You have a close relationship now. Were you always friends from the off? CC: We were actually! I think we were just very like-minded. We loved our cricket. We were just cricket mad. That is something that I only really had in common with probably one or two players. We are just such cricket badgers really, aren’t we? So when we roomed together, both on and off the pitch it was just cricket, cricket, cricket. I suppose that’s probably because of our upbringing: because of our dads, playing in a men’s club, being in that cricket world.CE: Our dads didn’t know each other before, but when we started playing together they would talk. All the time.Can you remember the first time you batted together?

“As a new captain I always turned to Lot. I think because we thought quite similarly about people and about the game, and I suppose the friendship we had bolstered that”Clare Connor

CE: I remember us opening the batting together for England Under-19s. John Major was there. That was a massive day when [Cathryn] Fitzpatrick [Australia’s demon quick of the time] was coming steaming in at us. She really fancied bowling at us two! Or she just liked bowling at Clare… I used to just be like, “Conny, can you just shut up!” because I was at the other end to Clare and she kept winding Fitzpatrick up and I kept on getting all these bouncers! That wasn’t very nice!CC: We did click, definitely. I think it was because I became captain young [at 23], and Lot was this constant in the team, and we’d gone through everything to get there. I was made captain mid-tour in 2000, and that was a bit of a turbulent time. There were lots of senior players around – more senior players than us – and it was not an easy period. I always turned to Lottie, you know, and obviously then she became my vice-captain in ’02. So we did about four years together as captain/vice-captain. How old were you when you became captain?CE: 25.CC: Both quite young. And, it was just a tough time. We’d been to Australia, we’d got hammered out of sight. We had a bit of a blame culture; the batters and the bowlers, it was a bit cliquey. It was really tough – we’d lost for a long time. As a new captain I always turned to Lot. I think because we thought quite similarly about people and about the game, and I suppose the friendship we had bolstered that.CE: I remember once in the 2005 World Cup when I had to go and stick up for Con because Batesy [Richard Bates, then the England coach] was… there was a problem around a tactical thing that he believed in and I remember coming off the field and Conny was really upset in the changing room and I just realised, “I’ve got to step in here”. I went and spoke to the coach and just said, “Listen, we can’t have this. We can’t have you criticising the captain on what she’s doing. She’s trying to do the best”. I remember that being quite a tough time. Clare didn’t have it easy at all when she was captaining, because she took on a senior group of players.After this period that was evidently very tricky, around 2000 – 2005, there was a lot then made of the men winning the Ashes after 18 years, but for you it was 42 years. How did it go from this period of defeat, to this huge achievement?Connor: “When we roomed together, both on and off the pitch it was just cricket, cricket, cricket”•Getty ImagesCE: We beat New Zealand in ’04 for the first time in 12 years. And we’d never beaten New Zealand. We couldn’t even beat them in a game, let alone a series. And we still hadn’t beaten Australia at this point. So we knew that beating them was a huge step forward to beating Australia.CC: Yep, huge confidence booster. By 2005, the Ashes summer, I’d played for England for ten years, and never beaten Australia! They had such a hold over us. And I will never forget the emotions at Stratford. That was the first time we’d ever been on a cricket pitch and beaten them. We just didn’t know what to do with ourselves.CE: I didn’t know where to go, or what to do. It was just the best feeling ever!CC: But that kind of moment was so huge for the team. Going back to the likes of Lydia Greenway, Isa Guha, Jenny Gunn, they were all involved in that. Holly Colvin as a 15-year-old. Arran Brindle…Talking about Colvin’s selection… Charlotte, were you involved in that as well? It was all a bit on a whim wasn’t it?CC: Oh yes, that was hilarious! That was one of our funniest moments! So we were at Hove, Holly was about to go on a geography field trip aged 15. But because the Aussies had a good left-arm orthodox spinner, we brought Holly in to training. We’re in the nets at the top of the ground – and she got everyone out. She got Lot out, she got Tails [Claire Taylor] out, she got everyone out – comfortably. So everyone was sort of looking at each other, thinking, well, this is just a bit outrageous… And we sat on the outfield, you, me and Batesy…CE: Well, you were sat there, and then you went “Lot, Lot, come over here”. I was vice-captain and they said, “If we were to pick Holly Colvin in the XI tomorrow, what would you say?” And I said, “Go for it!” But it was the most ridiculous thing, because she didn’t have a room!CC: Arran Brindle had to move! Holly had to have her own room, because she was under age. There was no space at the hotel, so Brindle and her husband had to go and stay in my flat, in Hove, so that Holly could stay in the hotel! It was the most left-field way of doing selection. It was opportunistic and it worked – she was on a hat-trick in the first innings.So going back to that summer – that summer was so important, because everyone just suddenly believed. And then six months later, I stepped down and Lot took over. It felt perfect. It felt like it was written in – I’d done as much as I could do, Lot was totally champing – ready to take over. Perfect timing for me and for the team and for Lottie to take over the captaincy.Talking to a few players who played under both of you as captains – they were equally full of praise for you both, but they did note your different approaches to the role. Clare, you were perceived as a bit gentler, whereas Lottie you have been described as a bit more hands-on, stamping your authority. Do you think the approaches complemented each other?CC: I think that it was all in the timing. I think that I had to be that. I was 23, I was dealing with a very different dressing room than Lot was. Lot with her huge record as a batter and the fact that the team was in a really good place when she took over, I think that she could kind of just do that and take everyone onto the next level which was exactly what needed to happen. Do you think that’s what it was?

“Conny will push more for us than anyone, like the Chance to Shine contracts, and our professional contracts. It’s brilliant that she’s in a job like this, because she always wants the best for us”Charlotte Edwards

CE: Yeah. I was more than ready, I think, to become captain. It was the next step for me as a person. I’d played for a long time, I’d learnt a lot, I’d roomed with Clare, I felt as though I’d gone through her whole captaincy.CC: Yes, she’d lived it! I’d wake up and whisper over to her, “Lot, are you awake…”CE: “I am now!”CC: At five in the morning, I’d ask, “What do you think we should do?”CE: I lived and breathed it with her for four years. Because she loves her little chat about it all, as I do.How easy have you found it to separate the personal from the business side of things now that Clare is an administrator and Lottie is a player?CE: Really easy to separate, to be honest. I wouldn’t be as successful as I am today without Conny. The stuff that Conny’s done for cricket over the last I don’t know how long! We wouldn’t be in a position like this at all. I take a lot of the plaudits for the team’s success, but without what’s going on underneath us… and that’s not me blowing hot air up her arse… I really do believe that.Clare, you had an extremely successful playing career. Do you ever feel that your own career has been subsumed by both the current team’s success, and your success in your role post-cricket?CC: Oh, no, I’ve never thought of it like that at all. I’ve just felt unbelievably lucky to have done it all in quite a short time frame. I’ve played for England for ten years and then I’ve been in this job for five years, and I just feel unbelievably lucky. I don’t ever have those feelings.CE: That’s one thing that you’re very good at. Conny will push more for us than anyone. Some ex-players think, “Well I never got it so I’m not going to give it to them'” Conny pushes it, like the Chance to Shine contracts, and our professional contracts. It’s brilliant that she’s in a job like this, because she always wants the best for us.Honestly, when I heard about the professional contracts, I nearly crashed my car! Everyone keeps asking me, “Were you banging the drum for it?” And I keep on saying, “No, I wasn’t banging any drum!” I didn’t even know. If you could have seen my face when I got it. I nearly cried! Con always keeps pushing. You speak to her every few weeks and she says, “Ah yes, the next thing, the next thing…”Something that caused a bit of controversy was when Lottie was quoted as saying in January she’d be celebrating the Ashes win by “getting smashed”. Clare how did you feel about this from a management side? Did you have to rap her knuckles?CE: [] She sent me an email saying, “Don’t take your phone out and tell everyone else to leave theirs behind”. I remember sitting down in reception and the girls were so worried that I was in trouble! I didn’t actually think about what I’d said at the time, and then when I went back upstairs everyone was flapping. But that’s not me, and I think that if anyone knows me, that is so not me. But I guess it’s just something that I’ll always regret a little bit.Clare was supportive! She said, “Lot, don’t worry, you made one slip of the tongue in 17 years” and was asking Beth, our media manager, to look after things. That put me at ease because you could sense the girls were worried that I was going to get in trouble, and, well, you do stupid things and you live and learn by your mistakes.CC: I suppose the key thing to come out of it really was that crikey, something Lottie said is now fuelling a debate on BBC Radio 5 live! So it shows I suppose the influence that you now have. The game has got that standing; people are bothered.Any off-field escapades you’d care to describe?Edwards: “I was more than ready to become captain. I’d learnt a lot, I’d roomed with Clare, I felt as though I’d gone through her whole captaincy”•Getty ImagesCE: I don’t know if any are suitable! Oh I know – do you remember waking up Freddo!?CC: Yes! Oh dear.CE: We were on one of the early tours, European Championships in the Netherlands, in Utrecht. It must have been 2:30 in the morning. We were quite young and obviously still buzzing and we woke Sue Redfern [England colleague] up – this must have been 1996 – we had the curtains closed, changed the clocks, had all of our gear packed and managed to persuade her that it was time to go to the match. We got her breakfast and everything, and then we opened the curtains – and obviously it was dark…You’d probably get more tales out of Arran Brindle though. She never drank. I mean we never, ever drank on tour except on the very last night and then we’d all go a bit mental. And Brindle was always the one that used to come out and shepherd us around and make sure we got back safely. Goodness, I remember one time waking up and my room was an absolute state – like a bomb had hit it.CC: Your room always looked like a bomb had hit it.CE: Yeah! Oh, goodness I was so messy and you were so neat!

Clarke perfects blueprint for the captain's innings

Match-altering, lead-from-the-front innings have become Australia captain Michael Clarke’s trademark over the past year

Brydon Coverdale in Brisbane12-Nov-2012There’s a certain Venn diagram that shows just how remarkable a cricketer Michael Clarke has become. In one circle are the men who have scored three double-centuries as Australia’s Test captain. Greg Chappell is there, so is Bob Simpson. In the other circle are those who have made three double-hundreds in a calendar year. Ricky Ponting is in that one. In the middle, fitting both categories, are Don Bradman and Michael Clarke.Clarke went to stumps on the fourth day at the Gabba unbeaten on 218. Within a matter of minutes, he was being interviewed on camera by Mark Taylor. It was an exhaustive chat, but Clarke was far from exhausted. He had been batting all day and looked like he could have kept going until midnight.These long, lead-from-the-front innings have become Clarke’s trademark over the past year. There was his 329 not out against India in Sydney, his 210 in Adelaide later in the same series, and most impressively his 151 on an early-season, seamer-friendly pitch in Cape Town last year. Not to mention 139 against New Zealand at the Gabba last year, and 112 in Sri Lanka last September.Leaving aside Bill Brown, who led Australia in only one match, Clarke’s average of 64.72 as the country’s Test captain is second only to Bradman. Not surprisingly, Australia have lost only two of the 14 completed Tests they have played since Clarke took over from Ponting in a full-time capacity. Thanks to Clarke and Ed Cowan, they won’t lose this one either.”I’ll say it’s coincidental,” Clarke said when asked if his rich form was the result of taking on the leadership. “I’m trying to improve every day … It has been nice to be able to lead by example with the bat. I’ve said for a while now it’s not what you say, it’s what you do. Ricky certainly showed that as captain of Australia for a long period of time, that he was scoring plenty of runs and the boys followed. It’s nice to be scoring some – hopefully I’ve got a few more left in me.”For me it’s about being fit and strong. Fitness has always been a big part of my life … being healthy and active. I guess over the last couple of years I’ve taken myself away from the team and done my own boot camp, for my mind as much as my fitness. There’s no doubt I feel a little bit fatigued, more mentally fatigued than physically fatigued at the moment. But I think that couple of weeks away of preparation has held me in really good stead for the last couple of seasons.”Clarke had some good fortune in the earlier stages of his innings, notably with a couple of miscued pulls that somehow fell safely. But having joined Cowan at the crease at 3 for 40, he was perfectly comfortable playing his shots – cutting the short balls and driving, straight and through cover – with the kind of timing that might have had the South African bowlers second-guessing their lengths.”One of the things Warney has taught me over the years is the better the bowling, the more positive you’ve got to be,” Clarke said. “That was certainly my intent from the first ball I faced yesterday: I wanted to be nice and positive and play my way to try and put it back on the South African bowlers because I know they’re a very good attack.”His scoring only became freer as the fourth day wore on and South Africa’s fast men were worn down. He saw off the second new ball without any serious concerns. His timing only improved, and to the detriment of Cowan, who was run out while backing up as Clarke’s powerful straight drive clipped the fingers of the bowler Steyn and crashed into the stumps.Then came more runs. And more. And still more. When the day began, the bookmakers were quoting odds of 101-1 for an Australian victory. By stumps, they were offering 9-1. Clarke and Cowan had batted South Africa out of the contest. Over the past year, Clarke has rewritten the book on the perfect captain’s innings. This latest chapter was a fitting inclusion.

New Zealand's top seven woes

Of all the full-member teams, New Zealand’s top seven batsmen have the poorest average in the last two years

Nagraj Gollapudi in Nagpur25-Feb-2011Brendon McCullum, having hit two boundaries against a wayward Shaun Tait in his first over, slashed hard at a wide delivery in the bowler’s next over only to be pouched easily at third man; Martin Guptill failed to go forward to a length ball, which kept low and hit his off stump; Jesse Ryder, feet static, chased and nicked a Mitchell Johnson delivery that moved away a wee bit after pitching on a length; Ross Taylor moved in trying to play across to an inswinging yorker that re-arranged his furniture; James Franklin and Scott Styris played shots they will never even attempt in the nets.None of those deliveries were really unplayable. Few could have been actually left alone. On paper most of these names are a top cast and evoke a strong appeal, but come audition day they tend to fail miserably, and often. Firsthand it is difficult to know if the hurdles are more mental than technical. The one certainty is New Zealand’s top order has had more troughs than peaks in the recent past.In the last two years, New Zealand’s top-order batsmen (Nos. 1 to 7) average the least among all full-member teams. In 25 matches since January 2009, New Zealand’s top seven average 27.49. That is less than even Zimbabwe, whose batsmen score at 28.48 runs. The best teams like India and South Africa peak above the 40-run mark. Another damning number in the same period is the New Zealanders have registered 36 ducks, a record for any team. On a per match basis New Zealand have less than one fifty-plus score, which is lower than all other teams.On the back of the disaster back home, it was pretty evident that New Zealand’s players were a little bit distracted. But Daniel Vettori, a man who is stoic at the best of times, said later that they were professionals and the remorse felt back home could not be compared or used as an excuse for the dip in the performance today. So is it then the mental approach of players that is vulnerable? Considering the match had been designated for the Chappell-Hadlee Trophy, it was natural for the players to stay pumped up. Sadly, on Friday, there was only team which was high on adrenaline and it was not New Zealand.Never once during their act did New Zealand look fluent and solid. They started slowly and grew more timid every over. In the first 15 overs, when the first two Powerplays were on, New Zealand had 78 dot balls and lost their top five batters. Australia had come out with a plan and Ricky Ponting deployed his pace arsenal of four quicks for the first 19 overs to combat the opponent. It worked wonders. “The pressure that Australia put on us in a number of different aspects really hurt us but in the end it was about wickets. It is more about psyching up the pressure and being able to repel that,” Vettori said. He felt the batsmen could have hit back through coming back in the batting Powerplay but that never happened because there was no man left standing.To begin with, McCullum was frenetically chasing everything Tait threw at him and trying to hit it hard. Considering he was facing the fastest bowler in the game, a better ploy could have been to just use the pace to his advantage. McCullum is New Zealand’s senior-most top-order batsman, and the team looks to him to provide the ballistic starts he is famous for. But it is not mandatory that he needs to go guns blazing each time. He can study a like-minded batsman in Virender Sehwag, who is showing the determination to bat out as long as possible, which effectively helps India reach bigger totals. It is not necessary that McCullum to go bashing in the first fifteen. If he can last longer he can always convert the final 15 overs into a Powerplay and use the long handle. His team will have no complaints.It is just not McCullum who has cobwebs to clear. It is difficult to understand the reason a batsman like Ryder, who scored a brilliant 107 in the final match of the one-day series at home against Pakistan earlier in the month, cannot thread together two big scores on a trot. After the early fall of McCullum, New Zealand depended on Ryder to provide the thrust. He gladly licked Johnson when he failed to get enough height on some short-pitched deliveries aimed at Ryder’s hips. A few words were exchanged and Ryder was not shy to open his mouth. But then when Johnson pitched it a little fuller Ryder grew circumspect.”The two balls in the over before [which Ryder pulled for fours] I did not get them right. I obviously fed him on his hips where he likes them,” Johnson said. But Johnson improvised his length immediately. “I actually said to Ricky that I just felt I would nick him off from that good length. Fortunately he nicked it for me. Not sure the plan of bowling short and not getting it up worked but just bowling that good length worked.”That was the case with most other batsmen. Australia had many plans today. New Zealand had barely any answers. Vettori was concerned. “We have got very good players in the top 5. We just need to be stand up and be counted particularly in these big games. They have got the skills, but we have to look it as a unit. We got to find a way to find a result.”New Zealand’s top five can learn a lot from the grit of Nathan McCullum, who has hit three half-centuries in his last four innings. If he can dig in deep, why not the rest.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus