Veja data e hora dos jogos da terceira fase da Copa do Brasil 2024

MatériaMais Notícias

A Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (CBF) definiu data e hora dos jogos da terceira fase da Copa do Brasil 2024. Os confrontos foram definidos anteriormente, em sorteio realizado na sede da entidade no dia 17 de abril. Ao total, 32 equipes disputam, em partidas de ida e volta, 16 vagas nas oitavas de final, além da premiação de R$ 3,465 milhões pela classificação.

continua após a publicidade

➡️Siga o Lance! no WhatsApp e acompanhe em tempo real as principais notícias do esporte

Aposte no campeão da Copa do Brasil!

As odds disponíveis no Lance! Betting mostram que o Flamengo é o favorito para vencer a competição neste ano, com uma cotação de 5,20. Ou seja, apostando R$ 100, você pode faturar R$ 520 com o título do Rubro-Negro! Por outro lado, o atual campeão São Paulo pagará R$ 1.300 com os mesmos R$ 100 de aposta, caso repita a dose e conquiste o bicampeonato!

APOSTE JÁ!

Confira abaixo data e hora dos jogos da terceira fase da Copa do Brasil 2024:

JOGOS DE IDA
30 de abril (terça-feira)
19h – Bahia x Criciúma (Arena Fonte Nova)
20h – Operário-PR x Grêmio (Germano Kruger)
21h30 – Atlético-MG x Sport (Arena MRV)

continua após a publicidade

1º de maio (quarta-feira)
16h – Sampaio Corrêa x Fluminense (Kleber Andrade)
16h – Brusque x Atlético-GO (Arena Joinville)
18h – Sousa x Red Bull Bragantino (Marizão)
18h – Ypiranga-RS x Athletico-PR (Colosso da Lagoa)
19h – Fortaleza x Vasco (Arena Castelão)
20h – América-RN x Corinthians (Arena das Dunas)
21h30 – Flamengo x Amazonas (Maracanã)
21h30 – Internacional x Juventude (Beira Rio)

2 de maio (quinta-feira)
19h – Botafogo x Vitória (Nilton Santos)
19h30 – Águia de Marabá x São Paulo (Mangueirão)
20h30 – CRB x Ceará (Rei Pelé)
21h30 – Goiás x Cuiabá (Hailé Pinheiro)
21h30 – Palmeiras x Botafogo-SP (Allianz Parque)

continua após a publicidade

➡️A boa do Lance! Betting: vamos dobrar seu primeiro depósito, até R$200! Basta abrir sua conta!

JOGOS DE VOLTA
21 de maio (terça-feira)
19h – Vitória x Botafogo (Barradão)
20h – Corinthians x América-RN (Neo Quimica Arena)
21h30 – Vasco x Fortaleza (São Januário)

22 de maio (quarta-feira)
18h30 – Red Bull Bragantino x Sousa (Nabi Abi Chedid)
19h – Fluminense x Sampaio Corrêa (Maracanã)
19h – Atlético-GO x Brusque (Antônio Accioly)
19h – Sport x Atlético-MG (Arena de Pernambuco)
19h30 – Grêmio x Operário-PR (Arena do Grêmio)
20h – Athletico-PR x Ypiranga-RS (Ligga Arena)
21h – São Paulo x Águia de Marabá (Morumbis)
21h30 – Amazonas x Flamengo (Arena da Amazônia)
21h30 – Juventude x Internacional (Alfredo Jaconi)

23 de maio (quinta-feira)
19h – Criciúma x Bahia (Heriberto Hülse)
19h – Botafogo-SP x Palmeiras (Santa Cruz)
21h30 – Ceará x CRB (Arena Castelão)
21h30 – Cuiabá x Goiás (Arena Pantanal)

Tudo sobre

Copa do BrasilSEO

Mets Announcer Roasted Team’s First Baseman After His Embarrassing Mistake

The New York Mets lost at home to the Cleveland Guardians, 7-6, on Monday night and now sit 1.5 games back of the Philadelphia Phillies in the NL East.

The Mets had Mark Vientos at first base against the Guardians, which was just the second time this season he has played that position. He was immediately tested in the first inning when Cleveland's Angel Martines hit a lazy foul pop up between home and first.

This looked like it should have been an easy out but Vientos overran it and could only watch as the ball fell to the ground behind him.

Mets announcer Ron Darling didn't hold back, saying: "I don't know what to say. I mean, c'mon. It's a pop up. Let's go!"

Here's how that played out:

That mistake didn't end up costing the Mets, as Martinez ended up fouling out to the catcher but it was a tough look for Vientos. And it's safe to say Darling wasn't too impressed by it.

Diamondbacks Player Blasts Record-Setting Home Run Off of Mason Miller Fireball

Lourdes Gurriel Jr. enjoyed a productive night despite the Arizona Diamondbacks' 10-5 loss to the San Diego Padres on Tuesday night. Gurriel helped the Diamondbacks jump out to a lead with a two-run home run in the bottom of the first inning, then later tied the game with a clutch, two-run shot off of Padres flamethrowing closer Mason Miller in the bottom of the eighth inning.

But Gurriel's homer was more than just clutch.

It was historic. The round-tripper came off of a 103.9 mph fastball from Miller, making it the fastest pitch homered on in the pitch-tracking era, which dates back to 2008.

Miller, who has thrown the fastest pitch in MLB this season, spared no velocity in the at-bat with Gurriel, as the Padres reliever hurled two other pitches clocked at 103 mph or higher, both of which were fouled off by an on-time Gurriel.

The Diamondbacks outfielder's unique homer ended up being a footnote after the Padres put up a five-spot in the top of the 11th inning, leading to their eventual victory and Arizona's loss.

Javed Miandad and MS Dhoni: a tale of two ageing lions

Watching the 1996 India-Pakistan World Cup semi-final brought home the similarities between the two master ODI chasers

Sidharth Monga06-Apr-2020 the best in the business at it.” Gavaskar is quick to point out Miandad has not played for two years. When the equation gets particularly difficult, Khan, the other half of perhaps the greatest love-hate relationship in cricket, says a Miandad ten years younger would have pulled it off.However, the Indian team, the crowd, even the commentators, are not so sure. They have been at the receiving end so often they can’t breathe easy till they see the back of Miandad. And Miandad is not taking any risks. Instead Rashid Latif hits Javagal Srinath for a six and a four. In the next over, to the 53rd ball he faces, Miandad hits a straight boundary, the first of his innings. Look at his swagger now. He struts back, knocking gloves with Latif on the way. If you have lost unlosable matches to this man, this is a triggering sight, never mind that his strike rate has only now crossed 50, and the asking rate is nine.

It is the belief that they can still do it that sets them apart. It is this belief that has to one day become their downfall. It happens to the best of them

Miandad knows his presence at the end is crucial: analyse every situation, fight, take games deep is his cricketing philosophy. Once Latif falls, though, carrying as he was what two men should have been carrying, the spotlight turns on Miandad. He tries the big hits but they don’t come off. And he eventually runs himself out. A tame end to a tame last stand.Why it is so relatable is because we witnessed something similar at the World Cup last year. MS Dhoni is Miandad in many ways. He finds motivation in persecution, although he doesn’t make public shows of it. As a 50-over batter he has struck the same kind of fear in the opposition that Miandad once did. Which is why, despite being aware of his waning powers – much like Pakistan with Miandad – India invested in Dhoni at the 2019 World Cup.Just like Miandad, Dhoni was happy for others to do the hitting around him, Ravindra Jadeja in this case. They both left alone balls in tall chases, just that Dhoni did so in an era of memes. Dhoni didn’t make a comeback after an absence, but it wasn’t yet ruled out in a pre-Covid-19 world that Dhoni might come back to the IPL after chilling for a year and then go to the T20 World Cup. As things stand now, both players ended with run-outs, risks taken much sooner than they liked to take, a sign of faltering confidence in their own ability. Not before both had struck momentary fear in the opposition. Admittedly, Dhoni hadn’t deteriorated as much as Miandad. According to Hardik Pandya, he was kicking himself for not diving.To some, watching them meet an unsatisfactory end (though Dhoni hasn’t officially ended yet) might be painful, but I haven’t found myself wishing either had retired sooner. These matches are just a rite of passage. Miandad and Dhoni didn’t become the players they were by recognising defeat when they saw it. Four years before the 1996 World Cup, Miandad was not even selected – by Khan – but not only did he find a way to get into the side but also ended up as the second highest run-getter in the tournament, and his side’s highest.It is this belief that they can still do it that sets them apart. It is this belief that has to one day become their downfall. It happens to the best of them. Unlike champions, this process never gets old. RetroLive

The kings of the Dukes ball and how it wasn't all bad for spin

Which batsmen and bowlers especially enjoyed using the Dukes ball?

Andrew McGlashan and Shiva Jayaraman03-Jul-2020The Sheffield Shield season of two halves is over, at least for now. Cricket Australia has announced the Kookaburra ball would be used throughout the competition rather than the Dukes coming into play for latter part of the tournament after the Big Bash.The Dukes has been in use since 2016-17, with the primary aim of giving Australian players more practice against the type of ball (although a modified version) that had often troubled them for a decade in England. Last year, the Ashes was retained in England for the first time since 2001 so, in that sense, the plan had come together although it hadn’t always enjoyed rave reviews on the domestic circuit.But who fared best when it was in play? We take a look at some of the numbers from the last four years of the Shield.In the runs

Victoria opener Marcus Harris, who played the last three Tests of the Ashes, is the top run-scorer against the Dukes ball. The form that earned Matthew Wade a recall for that tour is highlighted by his numbers – including a Dukes average of 59.38 – while Marnus Labuschagne’s far more mundane numbers highlight the speed of his development over the last 12 months where he’s scored runs against anything. New South Wales’ Daniel Hughes is again highlighted as one of the most consistent players in the Shield while Nic Maddinson’s prolific form in the last two seasons is reflected.In terms of the difference between the top 15 run-scorers against the Dukes and their Kookaburra record, Ed Cowan, who retired in 2018, has the biggest swing and could lay claim to being the king of Dukes batting. Matt Renshaw, who has slipped well down the Test pecking order, also has an outstanding return as does Hilton Cartwright despite the last two seasons being much more of a struggle.Overall, the batting average against the Dukes was 27.44 compared to 30.05 against the Kookaburra.In the wickets

The bowling list is unsurprisingly dominated by the seamers, although that is likely more a reflection of overall Sheffield Shield cricket over recent years than specifically the ball (more on that in a moment). The returns reinforce why Michael Neser and Peter Siddle were part of the Ashes squad and plenty of others in the table were in the debate ahead of that tour. James Pattinson’s Dukes average of 14.92 is eye-catching.Of those in the top 15 wicket-takers with the Dukes, Nick Winter, the left-armer from South Australia, has the biggest difference in the average in favour of that ball compared to the Kookaburra closely followed by Western Australia’s David Moody. The one spinner to make the list, Victoria’s left-armer Jon Holland, has similar figures with both.In a spin

It’s the spin numbers overall that are interesting to look at, given the talk of the health of spin bowling (beyond Nathan Lyon) in Australian first-class cricket. Bringing spin more into the game was mentioned in the Cricket Australia release about moving back to Kookaburra all season.In fact, over the last four seasons, spin has taken wickets at five runs fewer with the Dukes than the Kookaburra. And, if you compare it to the three seasons prior to when the different types of balls were used, the Dukes average is three runs better off with spin averaging 38.36 from 2013-14 to 2015-16. However, what is very noticeable is the reducing number of overs bowled by spinners in those four seasons even taking into account last season was truncated by four games due to Covid-19.

There are spinners, not least Shane Warne, who have said how the Dukes is a better ball for the art. It would appear more needs to change in Australian domestic cricket than just the ball to revive the fortune of spinners.

Should Pakistan go back to Azhar Ali, the opener?

Like Australia’s recall of Chris Rogers in 2013, it could be the right solution for the short term

Danyal Rasool03-Feb-2021A month shy of his 36th birthday, Chris Rogers had only ever played one Test match for Australia. This wasn’t a travesty of justice; for the best part of his career, the opener had to wait his turn behind Matthew Hayden and Justin Langer, and latterly a combination of Shane Watson, Phillip Hughes, Simon Katich and David Warner, each of whom were either better, sexier or younger than him. So the New South Welshman bided his time building up a rock-solid domestic career in both Australia and England, content that it was likely just about as far as his talent would take him.Fast forward to the 2013 Ashes series in England. Katich had been removed from CA’s contracts list two years ago, controversially, and Hughes’ inconsistent returns had led Australia to push him down the order in an attempt to get more out of his unquestionable ability. Watson had moved up and down the order too, and his most recent act in Test cricket had been his departure from India in the wake of Homeworkgate. Warner, meanwhile, had just punched an opposition player in a bar.Australia had a decision to make. They made one that didn’t look too far into the future or signal any long-term intent in terms of the direction they were taking. But calling up Rogers to plug a gap at the top proved a pragmatic and brutally effective step.He had over 20,000 first-class runs over the best part of 15 years, and more experience playing in England and Australia than most of his more established teammates. He lacked the boyish charm of Hughes, or Watson’s wrecking-ball drives down the ground, but he was a decent, honest professional who had built up a decent, honest career. He was also, if for the extremely short term, the best opener in the country.What might that have to do with Pakistan? Well, they’ve tried a plethora of opening combinations over the past decade, and looked about as likely to stumble upon a solution as a toddler fiddling with a Rubik’s cube. The trend continued with Abid Ali and Imran Butt against South Africa in Karachi, where they put on 5 and 22. They’ll almost certain retain the same pairing in Rawalpindi, but it remains to be seen for how long they endure.The most compelling argument for Azhar as opener?•ESPNcricinfo LtdSince the start of 2016, Pakistan have tried 14 different openers. Only India (16), and Sri Lanka and Australia (15 – remember, Rogers retired in 2015), have played around at the top more, and all three teams have played significantly more Tests than Pakistan in this period.In fairness, other Test sides – other than New Zealand (who have used just four) – have all had to juggle around at the top too, so for once, this isn’t a uniquely Pakistani problem. We appear to be in a golden age of Test match opening bowling partnerships, but that has spelled trouble for their batting counterparts. Opening partnerships have averaged 30.91 in the decade that’s just begun, and 34.51 in the 2010s. They’re the two lowest-averaging decades for opening stands since – wait for it – the 1900s.Since, arguably, the retirement of Andrew Strauss in 2012, no Test side has managed to lock in two set-and-forget openers, and the days of Langer and Hayden or Graeme Smith and Herschelle Gibbs seem like fuzzy, faraway memories.What makes Pakistan’s case so intriguing, however, is that they might have at least one half of the solution hiding in plain sight. Sometime during the past five years, Pakistan decided Azhar Ali was better suited at No. 3, where he has the majority of his career (110 of 158 innings). Perhaps Azhar, or Pakistan, or both, believe it’s his best position.But in batting him at No. 3, Pakistan have ignored his record as opener: his average of 45.76 at the top of the order is better than those of Alistair Cook or Andrew Strauss or Marvan Attapattu or Gautam Gambhir, among a host of other distinguished names. His accumulation methods might not be pretty, but his numbers certainly are.There is some nuance to those numbers, of course, not least because since January 2010, openers have averaged higher in the UAE and Pakistan than anywhere else, and while he’s yet to open at home, 10 of Azhar’s 37 innings as opener have come in the UAE. But Pakistan’s other openers in this period have also played a lot of their cricket in these two countries, and most have struggled to make the most of those favourable conditions.Azhar Ali has been part of some of Pakistan’s most durable opening pairs in recent times•ESPNcricinfo LtdShan Masood has struggled to buy a run since a superb 156 at Old Trafford, while just under 60% of Abid Ali’s Test runs came in his first three innings; he has since averaged less than 20. Imam-ul-Haq, meanwhile seems to have faded from contention, having last played Test cricket in 2019. Sami Aslam, who combined with Shan Masood relatively successfully – albeit briefly – has his eyes set on a career in the USA.It might be time to sit back and wonder, as presumably the bigwigs at Coca-Cola did a few decades ago, what was wrong with the old formula after all. Azhar Ali’s average as opener is higher than any other Pakistani batsman’s since January 2010. In that period, three of Pakistan’s seven highest-averaging opening partnerships have included him. He has a triple-hundred in the UAE from the top of the order, and he’s the only visiting opener in history to score a double-century at the MCG; no other current Pakistan opener has a double-hundred anywhere. If this wasn’t a batsman reputationally associated with the middle order, he’d be at the front of a fairly short queue of contenders making a persuasive case to face the new ball. It isn’t like he doesn’t face the new ball as things stand anyway, given he bats almost exclusively at No. 3 and Pakistan’s openers haven’t hung around for too long of late.And while Azhar is 35, the same age as Rogers before that 2013 call-up, this might not be the worst time to consider returning him to the top. Stripped of the captaincy with signature Pakistan insensitivity – for the second time in his career, his removal was known to the media before being officially communicated to him – Azhar has decided against doing his talking off the pitch, and has quietly begun building up a head of steam on it. A potentially career-saving hundred against Sri Lanka last year was followed by a likely match-saving century against England in the summer, a 93 in Christchurch, and two steely knocks against South Africa in Karachi in sticky situations that received less attention than they perhaps deserved.It certainly would be typical of his career to expect Azhar to bail Pakistan out just after Pakistan themselves bailed on him, but it’s also a reminder of what a versatile asset he has been over the years. Sure, his absence in the middle order would need serious plugging, but with Haris Sohail and Asad Shafiq currently out, and Agha Salman and Saud Shakeel among the squad, that is an area Pakistan could cover far more effectively than the opening positions.t the sIt’s not the sexiest idea or the longest-term solution. But Rogers, once recalled ended up playing 24 further Tests over two years, scoring 1996 runs at 44.35, including four Ashes hundreds and one in South Africa. That’s not a swansong. It’s a second career.About to turn 36, Azhar might not so much have been stripped of the captaincy as liberated from it. Pakistan have searched high and low for a man who might be half-decent at facing the new ball. It may be worth giving that dressing room one final look after all.

'The more I see this, the more I dislike the obvious deception'

Shoaib Akhtar, Lisa Sthalekar, Tabraiz Shamsi and others weigh in on the contentious episode

ESPNcricinfo staff05-Apr-2021

@alanwilkins22 I tend to agree with you on this…initially thought it was clever. This is where the umpires need to act & act quickly. But doesn’t take away what an incredible innings by @FakharZamanLive

— Lisa Sthalekar (@sthalekar93) April 4, 2021

Was this run out by @QuinnyDeKock69 against the spirit of the game?
I'd leave it for you guys to decide.#PAKvSA

— Shoaib Akhtar (@shoaib100mph) April 4, 2021

Completely against the spirit of the game. He shouldn't have ran him out. SA would have won the game anyway. What's happened to sportsmanship? #Cricket #IPL2021 #barmyarmy #England #India #IPL https://t.co/PJNT2GYOwZ

— Monty Panesar (@MontyPanesar) April 5, 2021

Cheeky from @QuinnyDeKock69

— Azhar Mahmood (@AzharMahmood11) April 4, 2021

Just 2 clarify

QDK was NOT speaking 2 or pointing at the batsman,he was asking a fielder to back up at the non strikers end

Not Quinnys fault the batman turned around 2 see instead of completing the run safely which he should have done

Stop the hate n Leave QDK alone#Peace

— Tabraiz Shamsi (@shamsi90) April 5, 2021

Bullshit. Honestly who cares regardless – don’t ball watch and slide your bat. @QuinnyDeKock69 is a terrible golfer but not a cheat – @FakharZamanLive amazing knock my bro amazing to see. https://t.co/QgYTv9XWeC

— Mitchell McClenaghan (@Mitch_Savage) April 5, 2021

Dan Christian has unfinished IPL business

His record in the tournament, for four teams, has been middling, but on the back of his recent success as a hitter and finisher, he’s looking to change that with RCB

Matt Roller23-Mar-2021Dan Christian’s most recent IPL game was a stinker. Brought into the Delhi Daredevils side after two weeks on the bench, he managed 7 not out off nine balls from No. 7, strangled by the Sunrisers Hyderabad’s pace-off options. In the chase, the Sunrisers needed 14 to win at the start of the final over. Christian was whacked for a six and a four by Yusuf Pathan, finishing with figures of 0 for 37 as the game was lost with a ball to spare. He was promptly dropped, and at 35 it seemed as though his unfulfilled IPL career had come to a subdued end.Three years later Christian is back, with success on the global short-form circuit under his belt – including four trophies. He was signed for Rs 4.8 crore (US$657,000 approx) by the Royal Challengers Bangalore in last month’s IPL auction and is looking to add a tenth title to his T20 trophy cabinet.The reason Christian is coveted is simple: he remains one of the best in the world at hitting boundaries at the end of an innings. Since the 2018 IPL final, only Kieron Pollard has scored more runs at the death than Christian around the world, and Christian’s strike rate in the last four overs – 192.69 – puts him in the same bracket as T20’s elite death-over hitters. Throw in the fact that he offers teams a sixth bowling option, the experience of 347 games – including nine wins in finals – and it is obvious why teams like what he brings them.”I’ve no doubt that I’m a better player than when I first played in the IPL – or when I’ve ever played in it,” Christian says from the UAE, where he is preparing for the season with Ben Cutting and Chris Lynn, following the postponement of the second half of the PSL. “I just feel like I’m a really good place with my game.ESPNcricinfo Ltd”I’m confident in what I’m trying to do when I’m out there, and from a batting perspective I’m really happy with how things are going. I just feel confident and comfortable in the role I’m playing in every side. All I’m really thinking about these days is just trying to win, so whatever a team needs at a certain time, I’m going out trying to do that.”The roots of Christian’s late-career flourish can be found in the end of his red-ball career. He lost his state contract with Victoria in early 2018, when he was phased out in favour of younger alternatives, and the result has been the opportunity to focus solely on his T20 skills – and in particular, his six-hitting swing.”It turned out to be a bit of a blessing in disguise, really,” he says. “I got the opportunity to play a few more tournaments and it’s worked out pretty well in the end. I think that the grounding that I got from playing four-day cricket is the majority of the reason that I’m still having some success, but being able to focus my training on T20 skills has helped me quite a lot.”It’s been about five years now of just playing this specific role: it doesn’t really matter where I am in the order, but I’ve been coming in around about the 10th-12th over mark – sometimes a little bit later, depending on which team I’m in – and playing that finishing role with the bat. I’ve been able to specifically train for that. With that grounding, you work out how to do it and what you need to do at what time.Specific training is not always straightforward when you live a nomadic, contract-to-contract lifestyle, but Christian has found a home away from home at Nottinghamshire. Since signing as a replacement for Daren Sammy midway through the 2015 T20 Blast, he has been a key part of the side’s short-form success, and has captained them since 2016.Christian sets specific scenarios for himself to bat to at practice•Lakruwan Wanniarachchi/AFP/Getty ImagesAs a result, Paul Franks and Peter Moores, the club’s assistant coach and head coach respectively, have been key influences. “Those two are the ones that have probably helped me the most,” Christian says. “Generally if I’m playing in another competition and I feel like I need to talk to someone about something, they’re the two that I’d go to.”I do a little bit of scenario stuff, where I’ll set up little games, with a coach who will be throwing balls or using the flingers, and I’ll need x off however many balls. But the main things I do are specific nets, where I’m facing bowlers and treating it like a one-day game – trying not to face any dots, knocking ones around, and then occasionally hitting a boundary. And then separate throwdowns or bowling-machine stuff, where I’m working on grooving my six-hitting swing and trying to hit the ball as far as I can while making sure that my shapes are still good.”I’ve done a lot of research and watched a lot of videos of baseballers and golfers and how they generate their power to help me with that. My personal opinion is that batting at the end, you almost need a completely different swing – a slogging swing – to what you do when you’re batting normally.”Golf has been of particular help for Christian, who plays off a handicap of three. “Watch the way a golfer swings and the way they use the lower part of their body to generate that power, driving up out of the ground – and the way their body coils before they release and then swing through the ball. I’ve tried to bring in a bit of that, just to help with that power.”I know it’s a completely different game – stationary ball versus a moving ball, and the fact there are so many other variables involved with batting – but there are some common themes with the way that you swing. I play a lot of golf – clubs are the first thing I’d pack going on a trip somewhere – and it’s certainly helped me with the general mechanics of it.”Christian was the Player of the Match for his 4 for 23 and an unbeaten 11-ball 21 in Nottinghamshire’s win in the 2020 Vitality Blast final•Nathan Stirk/Getty ImagesThe result is that Christian arrives at the IPL feeling as though he has a real chance to improve on his own mixed record in the competition and propel RCB into the latter stages of the season. Since he was signed for Rs 4.14 crore ($900,000) by the Deccan Chargers in the 2011 auction, Christian has been a semi-regular squad player in the tournament. He feels as though he has unfinished business after the heartbreak of the 2017 final, where he played for the Rising Pune Supergiant and needed to hit the last ball of the innings for four and could only manage two. Now he’s heading back to a franchise that picked him only twice in their XI in the 2013 season.”I’m really excited to be back and hopefully to have some success – both personally, and also trying to win one. I got really close in 2017, which was pretty disappointing and the IPL is one that I’d love to add to the trophy cabinet. I’m really looking forward to being back at Bangalore too – playing under Virat [Kohli] and with AB [de Villiers], Glenn Maxwell, and playing under Simon Katich, who I played with at New South Wales years ago and have known for a long time.”Last time I was at RCB, I was on the bench for the Gayle 175 game. That was extraordinary to watch – as good a show of hitting as you’ll ever see. One of the highlights that season was playing against Mumbai and opening the bowling against [Ricky] Ponting and [Sachin] Tendulkar – two guys that I idolised growing up, and two legends of the game.”I’ve made a bit of a joke on my social media recently that whenever I’ve won something, I put a caption saying ‘That’s why you play’, but it’s the truth. When you’re a kid and you first do something, you want to win – that’s where it all comes from. As your professional career ebbs and flows, you have other [goals] that might sometimes cloud that, but as you get older, you go full circle and go back to thinking about how you started, which for me was always that competitiveness of trying to win.”Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdChristian is not an automatic starter for RCB, with Maxwell, de Villiers, and big-money recruit Kyle Jamieson set to fill three of their four overseas slots for the majority of the season. But as he completes yet another period of quarantine – he has spent more than a month in mandatory self-isolation over the last year travelling for tournaments, playing online chess to kill time – he may reflect that any success he has in Indian conditions could help him press a case for an international recall.For all Christian’s experience as a short-format globetrotter, he has faced a paltry 28 balls in a T20I career spanning seven years, despite the fact that since his most recent appearance, on the 2017-18 tour of India, the finishing role has been a problem position for Australia. With two T20 World Cups looming, it is not completely out of the question that he could yet make a return.”I haven’t had much opportunity with the bat for Australia at all,” he says. “When I’ve played in the past, it’s generally been as a bowling allrounder. I’d love another opportunity – obviously Australia have never won a T20 World Cup, and being part of a World Cup-winning squad is one thing I’d love to do.”I’ve kept in touch [with the selectors]. I played a lot with George Bailey, so we speak a bit, and I’ve talked to Justin Langer a little bit as well – he might send me a ‘congratulations’ text if I’ve done something well.”I think it is realistic – I’m not completely on the outer, put it that way. If I’m putting performances on the board, staying fit, and the teams I’m playing in are winning, then I’d like to think that I’m certainly a chance.”

Bumrah and Shami, endless mindgames, and England's great malfunction

It’s difficult to recall a more self-destructive passage of play from England than on the fifth morning of the Lord’s Test

Andrew Miller16-Aug-20214:26

Harmison: ‘England completely lost focus; Anderson can stand up for himself’

Up in the media centre during the fifth-day lunch break, the great and the good (as well as the significantly better than average) were all united in their astonishment at the malfunction they were witnessing. Phil Tufnell, for one, was struggling to recall a more self-destructive passage of play from an England team in his lifetime, and he had lived a fair few of them.But this… this was something extra special. Rarely has a match-winning position been squandered so wantonly, so pointedly, so brainlessly – as England laid down their arms in the five-day war of attrition, and chose instead to lose themselves in an irrelevant battle of wills. And, by the time Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Shami had backed up their extraordinary batting by picking off an opener apiece for ducks to leave England 1 for 2, it was shaping up as the most wholesale capitulation ever known.Related

  • James Anderson vs India: A history of wickets and verbals

  • Jos Buttler dredges deep but can't block out reality as England come crashing down

  • Siraj finishes England off as India script famous win

  • Anderson, the oldest pacer with a Test five-for in 70 years

  • India refuse to go on the back foot

Everything that transpired on the fifth morning stemmed from the ugly but compelling events of the third evening. In the dying moments of that day, Bumrah’s ten-ball over to England’s No. 11 James Anderson, with barely a delivery in his half of the pitch and his front foot pushing the line in every sense, ignited the tinder-dry sensibilities of a rivalry that has rarely needed an excuse to get rowdy in recent years. After all, Anderson has been around long enough to remember the Trent Bridge Test of 2007, when a row over jelly beans provided India with just enough righteous indignation to make sure they had a series-sealing victory.As the players left the field, the animosity was plain. A grinning Bumrah, arms raised in a questioning fashion, as if to say to a livid Anderson: why shouldn’t I stick it up your jumper? Virat Kohli, inevitably, was in the thick of the action too, just as he would be on the resumption of his own duel with Anderson on day four, during which he informed England’s greatest bowler that “this is not your f****** backyard”. Words that, on the evidence of the bunfight that has subsequently erupted, look set to enter the annals alongside Michael Clarke’s promise to deliver Anderson a “broken f****** arm” in Brisbane in 2013-14.The point being, of course, that Anderson is old enough and ugly enough to look after himself in the international arena. He did not need his team to get emotional on his behalf. And, in fact, for the first 30 minutes of the final day’s play, England’s cricket was smart and focussed. Anderson and Ollie Robinson played the long game with the delayed new ball, challenging the dangerous Rishabh Pant to risk the first move. And though he duly did so with a familiar gallop and thwack through the covers off Anderson, Robinson did for him four balls later, with line, length, and a defensive prod to the keeper. It’s amazing what can happen when you bowl your best ball to any given batter.2:12

Where did England lose the plot against Bumrah-Shami?

By degrees, however, England lost their grip as soon as Pant had left the stage. Instead of caving in as the analytics said they would, India’s lower-order – ostensibly one of the weakest in modern Test history – signalled from the outset a refusal to play by their numbers. It took a moment of genuine cunning from Robinson (probably England’s last example of thinking cricket in the innings) to confound a feisty Ishant Sharma, a perfectly pitched knuckleball at 64mph, crashing into his front pad like a microlight with engine failure. But thereafter, their performance was entirely knuckleheaded.Foremost among England’s brain-fade was the use – or rather, misuse – of Mark Wood. Speaking to Sky Sports before the start of play, Wood confirmed that he had heard a “bit of a crack” when landing heavily on his right shoulder on the fourth evening, words that ought to have filled England’s management with untold dread, given how eviscerated their pace-bowling stocks have become since the long-term injuries to Jofra Archer and Olly Stone.Wood did not take the field at all in the first half-hour, seemingly a wise precaution, for there really was no need to change a plan that was still on course to deliver a victory target of less than 200. Instead, no sooner had he stepped on the field of play, he was back into the action – his “external” injury permitting him an immediate stint – and then, five balls into his first over, he flung himself to intercept a push from Shami and turned white with pain as he jarred the exact same shoulder. It should, by rights, have been the end of his day, there and then.Instead, the arrival of Bumrah meant all bets were off. As if his smiling visage wasn’t enough to get under England’s skin, his first act was to ask Haseeb Hameed at short leg to kneel before him and tie up his dangling shoe-lace, potentially a coincidence, but an expertly inserted length of needle either way. The first ball he faced from Wood was a bouncer – inevitably. So, too, the second. So, too, the third, as Bumrah wound into a hook, and found enough edge to get off the mark.Robinson rumbled in for another over, but despite inducing a low edge into the cordon off Shami, Joe Root was suddenly getting twitchy about the size of India’s lead. Bumrah sensed the mood, with a rasping straight drive that deflected off the non-striker’s stumps, and suddenly, that was that. No more freebies, as England’s best bowler of the morning found himself limited to a solitary wide slip, and a phalanx of boundary riders, essentially charged with keeping it tight while Wood knocked some blocks off.England had been outmatched in the mindgames every step of the day•Getty ImagesIt’s worth at this point to remember exactly who England were dealing with. The older members of the team might have had a dim and distant memory of Shami’s vague batting functionality, after he had made his only previous Test half-century at Trent Bridge in 2014 – a deck so dead that the match is now best remembered for Alastair Cook’s one and only Test wicket.But Bumrah… now he was a proper batting bunny. Statistically, if not stylistically, he had long been the closest thing to an heir to the most feckless tailender of them all, New Zealand’s Chris Martin, having made a grand total of 18 runs in his first 19 innings, including a highest score of 6, and an average of 1.80. All of a sudden, he’s harvested 62 runs in three innings on this England tour – the same, shockingly, as his captain, Kohli, and at a higher average too.It was in Wood’s third over that the mood of the match took its decisive turn. Prior to taking strike, Bumrah pulled out of his stance, gesticulating at England’s fielders, Root and Jos Buttler in particular, as Shami and umpire Michael Gough became involved too. His response was an angry hack, flat and fast through point as Kohli on the India balcony pumped his fist in approval and the lead marched into the 190s. And though Wood responded with a crushing bouncer to the side of the helmet, it was clear by this stage that such intimidation was pointless. Every ball not aimed at the stumps was an invitation for India to burgle another run, to bolster an already threatening stand, to exceed expectations that were already far beyond what they had hoped their tail could be capable of.Throughout it all, there was no sign of Anderson returning to restore order, at least, not until Root, perhaps already sensing that the moment was lost and that England’s only hope was for him to switch back into batting mode, vanished into the dressing room, presumably to run a few options through the number-crunchers. “Give it to Jimmy, dammit!” was the computer’s unsurprising verdict, but Shami greeted his third ball with a clip through midwicket that Dom Sibley could only dream of playing, before Root himself dropped Bumrah at slip off Moeen Ali, a clanger by any standards, but a head-in-hands moment that gave every snapper in the ground their 1000-word picture.And the remainder of England’s fielding effort was a fever dream. Shami slammed Ali for four and six over cow corner to march to a 57-ball fifty, and after the lunch break had passed in a will-they-won’t-they of declaration speculation, the pair got another trio of boundaries in nine balls, either side of a five-minute hiatus while Shami waited, with trousers at half-mast, for the delivery of a correct thigh pad. Again, it could have been an accident, but like Bumrah’s shoelace, there was no reason to think it wasn’t another psychological ploy. For England had been outmatched in the mindgames every step of the day. And as it turned out, their agonies were only just beginning.

Which were the most dominant teams in the T20 World Cup?

An analysis of the tournament that looks at resources remaining at the end of each match

Anantha Narayanan04-Dec-2021The last time I wrote an article on the T20 format was over four and a half years back. Since then, I have concentrated on the two longer formats. However, the recent T20 World Cup was an intriguing one and I wanted to make a special one-off effort to write an alternative summary for it. I will not talk about the toss, the dew, India’s performances, the bio-bubbles, net run rate and the like. Instead, I will talk about Team Performance Points (TPP), grounds summaries, what the teams did overall, and so on. Incidentally, I had to create a small one-time database for this article.In any T20 match, there are two types of resources available to the batting team. The number of balls, limited to 120, and the number of wickets, limited to ten. It is by now confirmed that it is the first of these that is the limiting factor. The average bowling strike rate for all T20I matches is around 19 balls per wicket, and the average number of wickets lost per match is 11.5. Only in 441 T20 matches (out of 1447 played so far) have teams lost all ten wickets in at least one innings. So the number of balls available is the dominant limiting resource.The net run rate (NRR), although a very effective measure, does not really convey much in terms of teams’ dominance. Two teams winning by identical NRR difference are treated identically. However, one team might have lost one wicket and the other eight.Let us now come to the types of wins. The two types of wins have to be handled independently. A team winning by wickets has not completed its innings and resources left, in terms of balls not faced. It is clear that a team that wins with 30 balls to spare has had a more dominant win than a team winning with six to spare. It is also clear that a team that wins with eight wickets to spare has had a more dominant win than a team winning with two wickets to spare. So what is needed is a clearly defined methodology while considering the range of resources available. (And because the balls are the limiting factor, more weight needs to be given to them than to the wickets available.)Ignoring DLS situations, a team wins by runs when both teams have had their full complement of 20 (or fewer) overs. It is clear that a team scoring 160 and winning by 60 runs has had a far more dominating win than a team that scores 160 and wins by ten runs. While accepting that the wickets lost in the first innings have had no impact on the margin, it is clear that a team scoring 160 for 2 and winning by 30 runs has had a more dominating win than a team that scores 160 for 8 and winning by 30 runs. For a runs win, I will take the base as 75% of the winning team’s score: any team that wins by 75% of the runs scored will get full points.Let me first look at wins by wickets. The winning team starts with a TPP value of 50 points. The following points are added to these. The losing team gets 100 minus the winning team’s TPP.A win where the target is chased within the powerplay is very rare indeed. I will take that as the base. Any team that wins by the end of the sixth over will get full credit. Until now, only 14 matches have been won within proper powerplays. The rest will be given proportionate credit, with 84 balls as the denominator.Wickets are straightforward and the team will get credit for wickets still available. Thirty points will be allotted for the balls resource and 20 for the wickets resource.Here are a couple of examples. I will take the two Indian losses in the World Cup since these were heavily followed.In the match against Pakistan, India scored 151 and Pakistan chased this down with 13 balls and all ten wickets to spare. Pakistan get 50 points for the win and 4.6 points for the 13 balls still available (30 x 13 / 84). They also get the full 20 points for the ten-wicket win, so their total is 74.6 TPPs. India get 25.4 TPPs. Looks very fair, indeed.In the match against New Zealand, India scored 110 and New Zealand chased this down with 33 balls and eight wickets to spare. New Zealand get 50 points for the win and 11.8 points for the 33 balls still available (30 x 33 / 84). They also get 16 points for the eight-wicket win, so their total is 77.8 TPPs. India get 22.2 TPPs. Note that New Zealand’s win is more dominant since their balls-remaining resource is much more. Look at it another way: they could have scored another 50 runs in the 33 balls available, while Pakistan could only have scored another 20 more.Now for wins by runs. Forty points will be allotted for the run margin, and ten points for the wickets resource. Again, a couple of examples.Afghanistan scored 190 for 4 in 20 overs, then dismissed Scotland for 60 and won by 130 runs. This huge win fetched them 92.5 TPPs. They get 50 points for winning, 36.5 points for the 130-run win (40 x 130 / 142.5) and six points for keeping six wickets in hand (10 x 6 / 10) in their first innings – 142.5 is 75% of 190. Note the low weight for the wickets. This is indeed a really huge win.Let us now look at a close win. West Indies scored 142 for 7 in 20 overs, and restricted Bangladesh to 139 for 5 and won by three runs. This narrow win fetched them 54.1 TPPs. They get 50 points for winning, 1.1 points for the three-run win (40 x 3 / 107) and three points for keeping three wickets in their first innings. This is a very narrow win and the points received reflects this.In summary, in wicket wins, the weights are closer (30 and 20) since all relevant numbers are in the second innings. In run wins, the weights are further apart (40 and 10) since the wickets measure applies to the first innings. Some might even say that the number of wickets lost by the winning team in setting up the winning score need not be considered. However, I have kept this low weight to take care of two contrasting situations such as 160 for 3 defeating 130 versus 160 for 8 defeating 130. The margin is identical but the latter team expended a lot more wicket resources. The TPP values of 67.0 and 62.0 reflect this difference.The main analysis incorporates only the tournament proper, consisting of 33 matches. At the end, I have given a table of the qualifying part of the World Cup.Anantha NarayananThe first table covers the top eight matches in which the winning teams were totally dominant.The most dominating match of the World Cup was played by Australia. After dismissing Bangladesh for a low 73, Australia wasted no time and reached this target with 82 balls to spare and eight wickets in hand. The TPP was a mammoth 95.28 (50 + 30*82/84 + 20* 8/10). They scored at over 12 runs per over. And every one of the “balls in hand” was important since they qualified at South Africa’s expense because of the magnitude of this win. India’s win against Scotland was a notch lower; they took one ball more. This kept their TPP to 94.92. This example highlights how well this TPP metric works in accounting for resources used and unspent.Now comes the only match in the top eight that was won by the team batting first. Afghanistan scored 190 for 4 and defeated Scotland by 130 runs. Afghanistan secured 92.49 TPPs (50 + 40*(130/(0.75*190)) + 10*6/10) and fully deserve this high placing. Next up is the West Indies-England match – West Indies scored a miserable 55 but England took their time and lost wickets. Their TPP was 87.0 (50 + 30*70/84 + 20*6/10).England’s eight-wicket demolition of Australia comes next. Their TPP was 83.86 (50 + 30*50/84 + 20*8/10). It was Australia’s indomitable fighting spirit that helped them recover from this result and go on to win the tournament. England’s blitzkrieg against Bangladesh was almost equally devastating, except that they needed 15 more balls to reach an identical target – a TPP of 78.50 (50 + 30*35/84 + 20*8/10).India’s nothing-at-stake hammering of Namibia follows next. They took over 15 overs to overhaul Namibia’s 132 but lost only one wicket and secured a TPP of 78.0 (50 + 30*28/84 + 20*8/10). The final entry in the table is New Zealand’s win over India. New Zealand secured 77.78 TPPs (50 + 30*33/84 + 20*8/10).When South Africa missed qualification for the knockout rounds quite narrowly on NRR, commentators reflected on their dawdling win against Bangladesh. That win does not even get into the top eight. In that match, Bangladesh scored 84 and South Africa’s laboured chase meant that they won with 39 balls and six wickets to spare. Their TPP was 75.9 – a comprehensive win, indeed. However, compare this against Australia’s win against Bangladesh – a far more dominating win securing 95.3 TPPs. This huge difference effectively explains what happened.Anantha NarayananThe table above features the closest eight matches in the main tournament.The closest win was by West Indies, who managed to carve out a three-run victory over Bangladesh. They defended 142 for 7 and secured a TPP value of 54.12 (50 + 40*(3/(0.75*142)) + 10*3/10).South Africa had a single ball to spare when they defeated Sri Lanka and secured 58.35 TPPs (50 + 30*1/84 + 20*4/10).Namibia had five balls to spare when they defeated Scotland to secure their only win in main round of the World Cup. Their TPP tally was 59.78 (50 + 30*5/84 + 20*4/10).New Zealand’s 16-run win over Scotland secured them only 59.96 TPPs (50 + 40*(16/(0.75*172)) + 10*5/10).Australia’s tough opening-day win over South Africa is next with 60.71 TPPs (50 + 30*2/84 + 20*5/10). The closeness of the contest is reflected in the 60-40 TPP scoreline.Then comes South Africa’s brave but futile win over England. They won the match and hearts but could not cross the NRR hurdle. They earned 60.82 TPPs (50 + 40*(10/(0.75*189)) + 10*8/10).Australia’s semi-final win over the impressive Pakistan comes in next. Australia had six balls and five wickets to spare while chasing 177 and secured the tally of 62.14 TPPs (50 + 30*6/84 + 20*5/10). The fact that the other semi-final was a mirror image of this match is confirmed by the TPP scoreline of 62.14 for New Zealand. (Asif Ali’s blitz, which led to Pakistan’s five-wicket win with six balls to spare against Afghanistan also secures 62.14 TPPs.)Anantha NarayananThe table above is a summary of the World Cup for the point of view of the 12 teams. The table is ordered by the win percentages of the teams.Fittingly, Australia lead this table, with a win percentage of 85.7, having won five of their six matches, their only loss being the trouncing at the hand of England. All their wins were secured batting second and their only loss was while batting first. At 63.9, theirs is the third-best TPP average, mainly due to this huge loss.Pakistan had an impeccable tournament until the semi-finals. They won five straight matches, defending as well as chasing. A poor over by their best bowler cost them a place in the final. Their TPP average was above 64.South Africa would rue their poorly planned chase against Bangladesh. Their only loss was the close one against Australia on day one. Their TPP average was a not-so-high 60.8.New Zealand lost a close match against Pakistan and sustained a resounding loss in the final. The closeness of many of their matches is reflected in the rather low TPP average of 58.8.In some ways, England had an excellent tournament. Look at their TPP average, which is the highest, at 65.1. However, their substandard bowling towards the end of the semi-final cost them.India’s tournament has been chronicled often enough, so I’ll avoid a repeat here. Three heavy wins could not compensate for two heavy losses. A win percentage of only 60 and a middling TPP average of 58.9 defined their tournament.The other teams had win% values below 50. Afghanistan won one match fewer than India but were in the semi-final race till late in the tournament. Sri Lanka were never in the hunt. The other four teams had eminently forgettable tournaments, although Namibia had their first ever win in World Cups.The team of the tournament was undoubtedly Australia, for many reasons, not least being the fact that they were the ones standing with the trophy at the end. Maybe closely followed by New Zealand and Pakistan.Anantha NarayananThe table above covers matches by the grounds where they were played, and in the tournament as a whole.It is clear from the numbers that Dubai was primarily responsible for the lopsided benefit of bowling first. Of the 13 matches played there, an outrageous 12 were won by the teams chasing. Abu Dhabi was better, with four wins out of 11 for the team batting first. Sharjah went the other way, with six out of nine wins for the team batting first. If Abu Dhabi and Sharjah are taken together, the ratio is a perfectly balanced ten out of 20 matches won batting second.The average winning TPPs have been 75.7, 69.5 and 67.2 for Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah respectively. That implies, by the number of wins and also the margin of wins, that the venue changed character dramatically as the sun went down. Once the first innings were out of the way, the teams batting second just seemed to coast through. There were very few close matches. Abu Dhabi and Sharjah were relatively better.The average first-innings scoring rate in Dubai was 6.86, and for the second innings it was 8.83, nearly two runs more. This indicates how tough first innings in Dubai were and how easy the chasing was. For Abu Dhabi, the figures were 7.28 and 7.47 – the second innings marginally better. For Sharjah, the values were 8.24 and 7.18, the first innings a fair bit more comfortable to bat in.Anantha NarayananThis last table covers the 12 qualifying matches, listed in order of the TPP differences. The most dominant match stands at 93.5 TPPs: Sri Lanka took just over seven overs to reach a paltry target of 45 and secured 93.5 TPPs against Netherlands. Oman’s opening-day win over Papua New Guinea (PNG) by ten wickets comes next. However, they had fewer than seven overs to spare. Then comes Sri Lanka’s comprehensive win over Namibia. The closest match was Scotland’s six-run upset win over Bangladesh. However, this was a more even phase of the World Cup. Five of the matches were won by teams batting first.In summary, I would say that, the undue importance to the toss notwithstanding, it was a very good tournament because there were very few runfests. There was only one 200-plus score and one individual century. And there is no doubt that the two most deserving teams competed in the final and the better team on that day won the tournament, fair and square.Calling for an all-time XV
In 2013 I ran a readers’ poll to determine a group of 15 players to be considered for an all-time World team. The response was excellent and the results very insightful and interesting. I now call for submissions again, since new contenders have emerged, as also new measures for selection. This is the last intimation. You can email your entries in one of three ways, with the subject “All-time XV – 2021”.- Send an email to my personal mail id, if you have it
– Send an email to the email id at the bottom of this article
– Send an email to the Talking_Cricket group, more on which belowWhen sending in your XV, provide your name, place of residence, and your list of 15 players (no more, no less). The team must be an all-terrain one. A manager/coach is optional. If you send multiple entries from one email id, I will consider the last one sent. Thus, you have the opportunity to change your selections. You don’t have to justify your selections; I prefer short emails. The entries should reach me by December 15. The entry that matches the final selection or comes closest to it will be acknowledged. This is the break-up of the squad by role:- eight batters/allrounders
– one wicketkeeper
– four pace bowlers
– two spinnersTalking Cricket Group
Any reader who wishes to join the general purpose cricket ideas-exchange group of this name that I started last year can email a request for inclusion, giving their name, place of residence and what they do.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus